Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76411 - 76420 of 77296 for judgment for u s.
Search results 76411 - 76420 of 77296 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
“‘exercise of a professional judgment in the face of alternatives that have been weighed by … counsel.’” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98373 - 2013-06-24
“‘exercise of a professional judgment in the face of alternatives that have been weighed by … counsel.’” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98373 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
); § 974.06(7) (stating that appeals from adverse orders under the statute are taken as from a final judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90409 - 2014-09-15
); § 974.06(7) (stating that appeals from adverse orders under the statute are taken as from a final judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90409 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might No. 2019AP489 5 reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might No. 2019AP489 5 reasonably make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
Pam Anita Cook v. Roger Paul Cook
, and whether the gain from its sale should, after judgment, be counted to increase that party's child- support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9384 - 2005-03-31
, and whether the gain from its sale should, after judgment, be counted to increase that party's child- support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9384 - 2005-03-31
Waukesha County v. Markus Meinhardt
to exercise its judgment on the underlying issue presented by the facts of the case, it was not free
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3547 - 2005-03-31
to exercise its judgment on the underlying issue presented by the facts of the case, it was not free
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3547 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Norris’ report concluded that Jim had “impaired insight [and] judgment with pain/psychotropic medications
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60886 - 2011-03-15
. Norris’ report concluded that Jim had “impaired insight [and] judgment with pain/psychotropic medications
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60886 - 2011-03-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will rather than its judgment; and (4) whether the Department could reasonably make the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62495 - 2014-09-15
will rather than its judgment; and (4) whether the Department could reasonably make the determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62495 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David Sautier
that the medication did not impair his judgment or his ability to follow the proceedings. There is no indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11280 - 2017-09-19
that the medication did not impair his judgment or his ability to follow the proceedings. There is no indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11280 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable, and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32518 - 2008-04-23
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable, and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32518 - 2008-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by the jury, when the jury returns its verdict, the pronouncement of judgment and the imposition of sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149114 - 2017-09-21
by the jury, when the jury returns its verdict, the pronouncement of judgment and the imposition of sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149114 - 2017-09-21