Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7651 - 7660 of 69052 for he.
Search results 7651 - 7660 of 69052 for he.
State v. Terry L. Jordan
motion. Jordan contends that: (1) he should be granted a new trial because “the trial court crossed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6727 - 2005-03-31
motion. Jordan contends that: (1) he should be granted a new trial because “the trial court crossed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6727 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 943.23(3), (5); 939.05; 946.49(1)(b). Hughes claims that: (1) he was sentenced on inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30728 - 2007-10-29
. §§ 943.23(3), (5); 939.05; 946.49(1)(b). Hughes claims that: (1) he was sentenced on inaccurate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30728 - 2007-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Jordan
-2052 2 motion. Jordan contends that: (1) he should be granted a new trial because “the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6727 - 2017-09-20
-2052 2 motion. Jordan contends that: (1) he should be granted a new trial because “the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6727 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin
alleged by affidavit that at the time his guilty plea was entered, he did not recall his attorney
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/negrete.pdf - 2012-01-31
alleged by affidavit that at the time his guilty plea was entered, he did not recall his attorney
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/negrete.pdf - 2012-01-31
[PDF]
WI APP 88
. Slater was on probation in a prior case involving the possession of drugs (“the drug case”) when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448265 - 2022-01-13
. Slater was on probation in a prior case involving the possession of drugs (“the drug case”) when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448265 - 2022-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
] He appeals pro se from the judgment entered upon those pleas and from the denial of various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54378 - 2010-09-14
] He appeals pro se from the judgment entered upon those pleas and from the denial of various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54378 - 2010-09-14
Frontsheet
its discretion when it denied his motion for a mistrial. He contends that he is entitled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31169 - 2007-12-10
its discretion when it denied his motion for a mistrial. He contends that he is entitled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31169 - 2007-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, Judges. Affirmed. ¶1 BRENNAN, J.[1] Sabian L. Yunck appeals a judgment, entered after he pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53429 - 2010-08-16
, Judges. Affirmed. ¶1 BRENNAN, J.[1] Sabian L. Yunck appeals a judgment, entered after he pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53429 - 2010-08-16
[PDF]
State v. Leo E. Wanta
evidence when an accused claims he is competent; (2) the evidence does not support his convictions; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21
evidence when an accused claims he is competent; (2) the evidence does not support his convictions; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Sabian L. Yunck appeals a judgment, entered after he pled guilty to three counts of knowingly violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53429 - 2014-09-15
Sabian L. Yunck appeals a judgment, entered after he pled guilty to three counts of knowingly violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53429 - 2014-09-15