Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7651 - 7660 of 9145 for jurors.
Search results 7651 - 7660 of 9145 for jurors.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 28, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
a case contrary to law or fact, much less a right to an instruction telling jurors they may do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28236 - 2007-02-27
a case contrary to law or fact, much less a right to an instruction telling jurors they may do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28236 - 2007-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
of jurors,” see State v. Grinder, 190 Wis. 2d 541, 551, 527 N.W.2d 326 (1995), is absent here. Moreover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43443 - 2009-11-11
of jurors,” see State v. Grinder, 190 Wis. 2d 541, 551, 527 N.W.2d 326 (1995), is absent here. Moreover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43443 - 2009-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or her and should convince the jurors.’ Further, ‘a prosecutor is permitted to comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101743 - 2017-09-21
or her and should convince the jurors.’ Further, ‘a prosecutor is permitted to comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101743 - 2017-09-21
State v. John Lee Doll
, and instead simply instructed the jurors to rely on their collective memory to answer the questions. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16326 - 2005-03-31
, and instead simply instructed the jurors to rely on their collective memory to answer the questions. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16326 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas A. Lisney
state that the evidence convinces him and should convince the jurors, as long as it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3179 - 2005-03-31
state that the evidence convinces him and should convince the jurors, as long as it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3179 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rhody R. Mallick
he refused, the court informed the jury of his refusal, instructing the jurors that they could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11606 - 2017-09-19
he refused, the court informed the jury of his refusal, instructing the jurors that they could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11606 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brian A. Patterson
surveillance on the apartment building. (Emphasis added.) The trial court immediately intervened, “Jurors, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5216 - 2005-03-31
surveillance on the apartment building. (Emphasis added.) The trial court immediately intervened, “Jurors, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5216 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian Swift
). A jury instruction is tainted and in error if a reasonable juror could misinterpret the instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6063 - 2017-09-19
). A jury instruction is tainted and in error if a reasonable juror could misinterpret the instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6063 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Cornelius R. Reed
directing the jurors to disregard the jail clothing would have had any impact on the outcome of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4561 - 2017-09-20
directing the jurors to disregard the jail clothing would have had any impact on the outcome of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4561 - 2017-09-20
State v. Anthony Liggins
could not prove prejudice because the jurors were expressly told that Liggins’s fingerprints were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2223 - 2005-03-31
could not prove prejudice because the jurors were expressly told that Liggins’s fingerprints were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2223 - 2005-03-31