Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7651 - 7660 of 12891 for prosecuting.
Search results 7651 - 7660 of 12891 for prosecuting.
State v. Antwon C.
.” The evidence to prosecute this case on June 18, 1996, was not “unavailab[le]”; the prosecutor sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12015 - 2005-03-31
.” The evidence to prosecute this case on June 18, 1996, was not “unavailab[le]”; the prosecutor sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12015 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
office responded that the prosecution had received DVDs from the Wind Point police department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36725 - 2014-09-15
office responded that the prosecution had received DVDs from the Wind Point police department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36725 - 2014-09-15
City of Princeton v. Karen E. Grams
the City from retesting the sample for drugs in order to prosecute Ms. Grams again if it does not prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24894 - 2006-04-25
the City from retesting the sample for drugs in order to prosecute Ms. Grams again if it does not prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24894 - 2006-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
by McToy’s continuing history of abusing Ms. H., but also her refusal to assist in his prosecution, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102980 - 2013-10-14
by McToy’s continuing history of abusing Ms. H., but also her refusal to assist in his prosecution, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102980 - 2013-10-14
State v. Derek E.
prosecutive merit. (c) The adequacy and suitability of facilities, services and procedures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13319 - 2005-03-31
prosecutive merit. (c) The adequacy and suitability of facilities, services and procedures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13319 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rudy A. Gerardo
in entering it was to protect his wife from prosecution). When a defendant is given no fair or reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12759 - 2005-03-31
in entering it was to protect his wife from prosecution). When a defendant is given no fair or reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12759 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
referred to allow a female to be prosecuted under any of those provisions as well. Had the legislature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33381 - 2014-09-15
referred to allow a female to be prosecuted under any of those provisions as well. Had the legislature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33381 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and if it came back as a match to Woldmoe, “he could expect to be prosecuted for perjury” – a conviction which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142665 - 2015-06-01
and if it came back as a match to Woldmoe, “he could expect to be prosecuted for perjury” – a conviction which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142665 - 2015-06-01
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet
that by failing to properly prosecute R.G.'s lawsuit, by failing to respond to discovery requests, and by failing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24
that by failing to properly prosecute R.G.'s lawsuit, by failing to respond to discovery requests, and by failing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24
Lawrence J. Plourde v. John Berends
in prosecuting this action. Summary judgment should have been entered on Habhegger’s behalf. On remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25437 - 2006-08-08
in prosecuting this action. Summary judgment should have been entered on Habhegger’s behalf. On remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25437 - 2006-08-08