Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76541 - 76550 of 91902 for 1.
Search results 76541 - 76550 of 91902 for 1.
CA Blank Order
the repeater status.[1] The other counts were dismissed and read in. Additionally, an operating after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96657 - 2013-05-13
the repeater status.[1] The other counts were dismissed and read in. Additionally, an operating after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96657 - 2013-05-13
Rule Order
then voted 4:3 to deny the petition.[1] Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the petition to create Supreme Court
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115410 - 2014-06-23
then voted 4:3 to deny the petition.[1] Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the petition to create Supreme Court
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115410 - 2014-06-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20).1 Ciardo was informed of the right to respond
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20).1 Ciardo was informed of the right to respond
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597920 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Cauley
.2d 1, 4 (1986). The claim of double jeopardy is conclusively without merit on its face because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8509 - 2017-09-19
.2d 1, 4 (1986). The claim of double jeopardy is conclusively without merit on its face because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8509 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Linda R. Cauley
.2d 1, 4 (1986). The claim of double jeopardy is conclusively without merit on its face because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8608 - 2017-09-19
.2d 1, 4 (1986). The claim of double jeopardy is conclusively without merit on its face because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8608 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2015-16), 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vogel received
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231305 - 2018-12-26
to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2015-16), 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vogel received
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231305 - 2018-12-26
[PDF]
State v. Dwayne E. Hudson
, Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Dwayne E. Hudson appeals from a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18444 - 2017-09-21
, Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Dwayne E. Hudson appeals from a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18444 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, 1 we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113461 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, 1 we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113461 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
counsel for Dominic Kolp, has filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132446 - 2014-12-28
counsel for Dominic Kolp, has filed a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12)[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132446 - 2014-12-28
State v. Donald F. Greeno
to enhancement for habitual criminality, in violation of §§ 943.10(1)(a) and 939.62, Stats. Seven additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8811 - 2005-03-31
to enhancement for habitual criminality, in violation of §§ 943.10(1)(a) and 939.62, Stats. Seven additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8811 - 2005-03-31