Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76541 - 76550 of 84463 for simple case search.
Search results 76541 - 76550 of 84463 for simple case search.
State v. William L. Brown
the facts in this case. Here, postconviction counsel was different than trial counsel and did raise a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25977 - 2006-08-29
the facts in this case. Here, postconviction counsel was different than trial counsel and did raise a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25977 - 2006-08-29
State v. Trevor Zeller
. See State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis.2d 493, 507, 451 N.W.2d 752, 755 (1990). In this case, no physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13601 - 2005-03-31
. See State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis.2d 493, 507, 451 N.W.2d 752, 755 (1990). In this case, no physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13601 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
charge. Id. ¶7 In this case, Bartow argues that he was prejudiced because he had not prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36631 - 2009-06-02
charge. Id. ¶7 In this case, Bartow argues that he was prejudiced because he had not prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36631 - 2009-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a) (“the court upon its own motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069739 - 2026-01-27
the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a) (“the court upon its own motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069739 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concludes, however, that the entirety of the case is before us for review under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847797 - 2024-09-10
concludes, however, that the entirety of the case is before us for review under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847797 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
City of Fond du Lac v. Wendy A. Compton
in this case is the standard accepted technique. ¶5 The reasonable inferences from this testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5244 - 2017-09-19
in this case is the standard accepted technique. ¶5 The reasonable inferences from this testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5244 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Mola
to a longer term of initial confinement in a different case, and the sentences were concurrent. Mola had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6868 - 2017-09-20
to a longer term of initial confinement in a different case, and the sentences were concurrent. Mola had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6868 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
100, 313 Wis. 2d 211, 756 N.W.2d 411—a restitution case—to “clarify whether a court gets its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445656 - 2021-10-26
100, 313 Wis. 2d 211, 756 N.W.2d 411—a restitution case—to “clarify whether a court gets its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=445656 - 2021-10-26
[PDF]
State v. Randall T. Riley
.2d at 700. In the landmark case, Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), the Court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13537 - 2017-09-21
.2d at 700. In the landmark case, Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), the Court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13537 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Glenn Eric Rhodes
not. No. 98-1724-CR 4 this case are not aggravating,” Rhodes’s long criminal history and the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14158 - 2014-09-15
not. No. 98-1724-CR 4 this case are not aggravating,” Rhodes’s long criminal history and the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14158 - 2014-09-15