Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76561 - 76570 of 84463 for simple case search.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2 this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502022 - 2022-04-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2017AP1014-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214443 - 2018-06-20

[PDF] NOTICE
. Accordingly we reverse. I. ¶2 This case had its genesis on January 10, 2006, at around half-past nine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28839 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2009-10).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92001 - 2013-01-21

COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 140 (1980), and we decline to do that in this case. ¶10 Next, Mey argues that we should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144514 - 2015-07-15

CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123442 - 2014-10-14

Milwaukee Insurance Company v. Richard Hurd
judgment is appropriate in cases where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11278 - 2005-03-31

Steve Meyer v. Melvin Schmitz
judgment, the initial burden is on the movant to demonstrate a prima facie case for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4496 - 2005-03-31

August Table of Unpublished Opinions
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19617 - 2005-09-12

James Sarlund v. Kimberly Mork
of such a person. Mork's alleged conduct in this case did neither. Therefore, we reject the argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9984 - 2005-03-31