Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7661 - 7670 of 12485 for abusive.

State v. Antione Hunter
, threaten, abuse or harass, [to] make[] a telephone call and threaten[] to inflict injury or physical harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4482 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
will not find an abuse of discretion if the record shows that the circuit court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116168 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Rochelle H.
experts who saw her upon that removal saw a child that they believed had been a victim of abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15000 - 2017-09-21

Sheboygan County v. Andrew C.H.
, Andrew presented a long history of serious mental illness and substance abuse. His current medication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16130 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. 2 The circuit court deemed Fitzpatrick eligible for both the substance abuse and the challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171584 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kerney Wright
. The declarant was the victim of a battery and was kidnapped by Wright. She was tied up, beaten and abused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10450 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
that Eddie had “habitually physically and emotionally abused” the children’s mother in front of them
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96917 - 2013-05-14

Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Tonya B.
with her drug and alcohol abuse. This is evidenced by her conviction in Lincoln County for driving while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5850 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 27, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
be to nullify the 331 days of credit, we view this result as a ‘clear abuse of discretion.’” Id. at ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89521 - 2012-11-26

Irving G. Wenzel v. Washburn County
the answer and before the sheriff's sale. Therefore, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8767 - 2005-03-31