Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76731 - 76740 of 84453 for simple case search.
Search results 76731 - 76740 of 84453 for simple case search.
State v. Cleveland R. Barnes
the Court’s decision in this case.” ¶3 On appeal, Barnes again argues that the sentence he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2010-12-06
the Court’s decision in this case.” ¶3 On appeal, Barnes again argues that the sentence he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2010-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
charge. Id. ¶7 In this case, Bartow argues that he was prejudiced because he had not prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36631 - 2009-06-02
charge. Id. ¶7 In this case, Bartow argues that he was prejudiced because he had not prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36631 - 2009-06-02
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95065 - 2013-04-02
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95065 - 2013-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059113 - 2026-01-05
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059113 - 2026-01-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a) (“the court upon its own motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069739 - 2026-01-27
the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.82(2)(a) (“the court upon its own motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069739 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by the nature
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175503 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by the nature
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673448 - 2023-07-05
decision. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673448 - 2023-07-05
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32699 - 2008-05-12
to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32699 - 2008-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concludes, however, that the entirety of the case is before us for review under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847797 - 2024-09-10
concludes, however, that the entirety of the case is before us for review under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847797 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
City of Fond du Lac v. Wendy A. Compton
in this case is the standard accepted technique. ¶5 The reasonable inferences from this testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5244 - 2017-09-19
in this case is the standard accepted technique. ¶5 The reasonable inferences from this testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5244 - 2017-09-19