Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76731 - 76740 of 83768 for simple case search.
Search results 76731 - 76740 of 83768 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We agree with the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175485 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We agree with the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the sentencing factors to the facts of this case, reaching a reasoned and reasonable result. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271656 - 2020-07-28
the sentencing factors to the facts of this case, reaching a reasoned and reasonable result. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271656 - 2020-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
harsh or excessive given the facts of this case. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App 181, ¶21, 276 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239882 - 2019-04-25
harsh or excessive given the facts of this case. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App 181, ¶21, 276 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239882 - 2019-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
WI App 79, 281 Wis. 2d 228, 695 N.W.2d 840,[3] a case that involved the same UIM endorsement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31687 - 2008-01-30
WI App 79, 281 Wis. 2d 228, 695 N.W.2d 840,[3] a case that involved the same UIM endorsement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31687 - 2008-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
Because the sentencing in this case occurred prior to September 1, 2007, the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33254 - 2008-07-01
Because the sentencing in this case occurred prior to September 1, 2007, the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33254 - 2008-07-01
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108709 - 2014-03-03
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108709 - 2014-03-03
State v. Jeffrey H. Andrus
. Our conclusion that the State breached the plea agreement does not resolve the case. As noted, Andrus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9189 - 2005-03-31
. Our conclusion that the State breached the plea agreement does not resolve the case. As noted, Andrus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9189 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
). Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104017 - 2013-11-12
). Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104017 - 2013-11-12
State v. Glen Proeber, Jr.
refusal was improper. Accordingly, we affirm. The facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10060 - 2005-03-31
refusal was improper. Accordingly, we affirm. The facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10060 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191973 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191973 - 2017-09-21