Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7681 - 7690 of 29968 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] NOTICE
An examination of the judicial authority of a circuit court presents a question of law that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32770 - 2014-09-15

State v. Neil P. Gates
. Our review of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15171 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
which relief may be granted, which is a matter of law we review de novo. See Data Key Partners v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218973 - 2018-09-12

[PDF] State v. Mario D. Harrell
reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549, 554, 518 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5198 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is procedurally barred is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Allen, 2010 WI 89, ¶15
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132247 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael J. Leeman
, to the facts of the particular case. This is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Olen v. Phelps
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14526 - 2005-03-31

State v. James A. Albright
satisfy the statutory standard of probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4382 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey J. Czerniak
factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5876 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Sean R. Haverty
rejected Haverty’s arguments and revoked his license. ¶8 This court reviews de novo whether undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21286 - 2017-09-21

State v. Richard T. Peffer
to arrest is an issue of law subject to this court’s de novo review. See State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2188 - 2005-03-31