Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7681 - 7690 of 83765 for simple case search.

State v. Rodney K. Harrison
search was not supported by either probable cause or exigent circumstances. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18843 - 2005-07-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
impounded Rogers’s vehicle and then searched the vehicle prior to the tow. Accordingly, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597433 - 2022-12-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of conviction. Upon reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295139 - 2020-10-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
applies in this case. We further conclude that Bertelsen’s attorney did not perform deficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757077 - 2024-01-30

[PDF] NOTICE
March 4, 2005, after he was jailed on a probation hold. The same day, officers obtained a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42482 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
substance—in this case, morphine, which is a schedule II controlled substance. See Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103179 - 2013-10-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
substance—in this case, morphine, which is a schedule II controlled substance. See WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103179 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 14
) (generally criticizing the Whren decision). ¶28 Although the cases cited in Whren were all search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35393 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
to believe that a violation of law has occurred. In each case we were addressing the validity of a search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35393 - 2009-01-28

[PDF] State v. Lance D. Pelky
motion to suppress the marijuana seized during a pat-down search performed by officer James Schaut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17656 - 2017-09-21