Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7691 - 7700 of 16544 for h's.
Search results 7691 - 7700 of 16544 for h's.
State v. Refugio A.
because “[h]is extreme youth, his ADHD[2] disability, and his disadvantaged family background mean that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15354 - 2005-03-31
because “[h]is extreme youth, his ADHD[2] disability, and his disadvantaged family background mean that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15354 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bobby C. Felicelli
within 1000 feet of a school in violation of §§ 961.41(1m)(h)1 and 961.49(1), Stats. The sole issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14415 - 2005-03-31
within 1000 feet of a school in violation of §§ 961.41(1m)(h)1 and 961.49(1), Stats. The sole issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Manuel Sergio Martinez
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County: BARBARA H. KEY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18201 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County: BARBARA H. KEY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18201 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rule 809.30(2)(h). Postdisposition review of protective placement orders under Wis. Stat. ch. 55
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85969 - 2012-08-08
. Rule 809.30(2)(h). Postdisposition review of protective placement orders under Wis. Stat. ch. 55
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85969 - 2012-08-08
[PDF]
State v. Bobby C. Felicelli
in violation of §§ 961.41(1m)(h)1 and 961.49(1), STATS. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14415 - 2014-09-15
in violation of §§ 961.41(1m)(h)1 and 961.49(1), STATS. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14415 - 2014-09-15
State v. William Gunderson
and the imposition of sentence; (h) At any other proceeding when ordered by the court. [4] Gunderson makes two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4983 - 2005-03-31
and the imposition of sentence; (h) At any other proceeding when ordered by the court. [4] Gunderson makes two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4983 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(h) (2023-24). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006506 - 2025-09-10
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(h) (2023-24). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006506 - 2025-09-10
[PDF]
Edwin Swedlund v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Rock County: JOHN H. LUSSOW. Affirmed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9450 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Rock County: JOHN H. LUSSOW. Affirmed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9450 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Melissa Ertz Rogge v. Paul Aaron Rogge
. Under WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(a) and (h), the court may revise a judgment if it was based on a mistake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19
. Under WIS. STAT. § 806.07(1)(a) and (h), the court may revise a judgment if it was based on a mistake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
were exculpatory evidence subject to discovery under WIS. STAT. § 971.23(1)(h). However, at the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617807 - 2023-02-07
were exculpatory evidence subject to discovery under WIS. STAT. § 971.23(1)(h). However, at the time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617807 - 2023-02-07