Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 76911 - 76920 of 83758 for simple case search.
Search results 76911 - 76920 of 83758 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to this case. See generally State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39- 46, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146199 - 2017-09-21
to this case. See generally State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39- 46, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146199 - 2017-09-21
State v. Esther T.
present in this case. The court acknowledged that for the past thirteen months, Esther has made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4354 - 2005-03-31
present in this case. The court acknowledged that for the past thirteen months, Esther has made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4354 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terry L. Cleveland
in this case. In sentencing Cleveland as a repeater, the court tracked the description of prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11121 - 2011-02-22
in this case. In sentencing Cleveland as a repeater, the court tracked the description of prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11121 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Felipe R. Domenech
, Felipe goes to jail…. (SC) OV: Um hum. FD: Orlando, I took a similar case in the eighties to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18810 - 2017-09-21
, Felipe goes to jail…. (SC) OV: Um hum. FD: Orlando, I took a similar case in the eighties to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18810 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Henry James Brookshire
, as in Brookshire’s case, the court exercised its sentencing discretion “to select a specific sentence within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18306 - 2017-09-21
, as in Brookshire’s case, the court exercised its sentencing discretion “to select a specific sentence within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18306 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary R. Knutson
manner.” Applying this test to the facts of this case, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9469 - 2005-03-31
manner.” Applying this test to the facts of this case, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9469 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
imposed. See Austin v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 727, 730, 183 N.W.2d 56 (1971). And in this case, the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33999 - 2008-09-15
imposed. See Austin v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 727, 730, 183 N.W.2d 56 (1971). And in this case, the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33999 - 2008-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
was a mistake. The question then is, was the mistake excusable. It was not. The dates in this case speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42688 - 2014-09-15
was a mistake. The question then is, was the mistake excusable. It was not. The dates in this case speak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42688 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
157 (1994). We affirm. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93228 - 2014-09-15
157 (1994). We affirm. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93228 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. The circuit court focused chiefly on Stephenne’s need for increased maintenance due to its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88589 - 2014-09-15
in this case. The circuit court focused chiefly on Stephenne’s need for increased maintenance due to its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88589 - 2014-09-15