Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 771 - 780 of 1132 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Tukang Pagar Plat Besi Sidorejo Salatiga.
Search results 771 - 780 of 1132 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Tukang Pagar Plat Besi Sidorejo Salatiga.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Denzine’s 2011 plat of survey “establishes the correct location of the boundary line between [the parcels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104961 - 2017-09-21
Denzine’s 2011 plat of survey “establishes the correct location of the boundary line between [the parcels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104961 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Further, ARTICLE I, (d) defined a “Lot” as “any numbered lot shown upon any recorded final plat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81647 - 2012-04-30
. Further, ARTICLE I, (d) defined a “Lot” as “any numbered lot shown upon any recorded final plat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81647 - 2012-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
from Frosty’s Bar[.]” However, the court stated it “look[ed] at the plat book now and I do realize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106915 - 2014-01-21
from Frosty’s Bar[.]” However, the court stated it “look[ed] at the plat book now and I do realize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106915 - 2014-01-21
COURT OF APPEALS
determined Denzine’s 2011 plat of survey “establishes the correct location of the boundary line between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104961 - 2013-12-02
determined Denzine’s 2011 plat of survey “establishes the correct location of the boundary line between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104961 - 2013-12-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Further, ARTICLE I, (d) defined a “Lot” as “any numbered lot shown upon any recorded final plat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81647 - 2014-09-15
. Further, ARTICLE I, (d) defined a “Lot” as “any numbered lot shown upon any recorded final plat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81647 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James R. Lasky v. City of Stevens Point
and only legal issues are presented. In re Cherokee Park Plat, 113 Wis.2d 112, 115-16, 334 N.W.2d 580
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13035 - 2017-09-21
and only legal issues are presented. In re Cherokee Park Plat, 113 Wis.2d 112, 115-16, 334 N.W.2d 580
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Law Office Information Systems, Inc.
court, without deferring to its conclusion. See In re Cherokee Park Plat, 113 Wis.2d 112, 115-16, 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13989 - 2014-09-15
court, without deferring to its conclusion. See In re Cherokee Park Plat, 113 Wis.2d 112, 115-16, 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13989 - 2014-09-15
Ellen C. (Hawes) Grendahl v. United Fire & Casualty Company
Park Plat, 113 Wis.2d 112, 116, 334 N.W.2d 580, 582-83 (Ct. App. 1983): Under that methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11656 - 2005-03-31
Park Plat, 113 Wis.2d 112, 116, 334 N.W.2d 580, 582-83 (Ct. App. 1983): Under that methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11656 - 2005-03-31
Town of Dekorra v. Dorothy Franzen
by the northern side of the park and Meffert’s lots. A recorded plat designates the shoreline strip as “reserved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14736 - 2005-03-31
by the northern side of the park and Meffert’s lots. A recorded plat designates the shoreline strip as “reserved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14736 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gregory Spinner and Marianne Giannis v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment, Inc
of this platted residential lot. 4. In absence of a variance, no feasible residential use can be made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12766 - 2017-09-21
of this platted residential lot. 4. In absence of a variance, no feasible residential use can be made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12766 - 2017-09-21