Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 771 - 780 of 6984 for a u.
Search results 771 - 780 of 6984 for a u.
[PDF]
State v. Damien L. Henning
not challenge the propriety of the officers' initial contact with him. He argues, however, that "[u]nder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12885 - 2017-09-21
not challenge the propriety of the officers' initial contact with him. He argues, however, that "[u]nder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12885 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a conjunction that is commonly “[u]sed to indicate the second of two alternatives.” Applying this common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103326 - 2017-09-21
a conjunction that is commonly “[u]sed to indicate the second of two alternatives.” Applying this common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103326 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents “exactly the same situation” as Smith. He asserts that “[u]nder the State’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240033 - 2019-05-02
presents “exactly the same situation” as Smith. He asserts that “[u]nder the State’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240033 - 2019-05-02
State v. Malcolm M. Mumm
states, in part, that “[u]pon arrest of a person for violation of s. 346.63(1) … a law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3415 - 2005-03-31
states, in part, that “[u]pon arrest of a person for violation of s. 346.63(1) … a law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Damien L. Henning
' initial contact with him. He argues, however, that "[u]nder the totality of the circumstances known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12885 - 2005-03-31
' initial contact with him. He argues, however, that "[u]nder the totality of the circumstances known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12885 - 2005-03-31
State v. David V. Pugh, Sr.
to arrest Pugh for driving while “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant … to a degree which renders [one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31
to arrest Pugh for driving while “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant … to a degree which renders [one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jansen Builders, Inc. v. Adam Group, L.L.C.
performance of a real estate contract for an erroneous exercise of discretion. See id. at 510-14. “[U
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2492 - 2017-09-19
performance of a real estate contract for an erroneous exercise of discretion. See id. at 510-14. “[U
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2492 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher Aaron Delange
a U-turn, and pulled the car over. The stop led to evidence of intoxicated driving, and the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6886 - 2005-03-31
a U-turn, and pulled the car over. The stop led to evidence of intoxicated driving, and the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6886 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of “or” as being a conjunction that is commonly “[u]sed to indicate the second of two alternatives.” Applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103326 - 2013-10-23
of “or” as being a conjunction that is commonly “[u]sed to indicate the second of two alternatives.” Applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103326 - 2013-10-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” “imprisonment for debt,” “[f]raud/[u]nconscionable contract or [c]lause,” “[n]o [o]bligation exists/unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006506 - 2025-09-10
,” “imprisonment for debt,” “[f]raud/[u]nconscionable contract or [c]lause,” “[n]o [o]bligation exists/unlawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006506 - 2025-09-10