Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 771 - 780 of 30059 for de.
Search results 771 - 780 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
Clearance rate summary: County and district
-activated Total Incoming Total Dispositions Outgoing Transfer-out De-activated Total Outgoing Net
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty20.pdf - 2021-02-11
-activated Total Incoming Total Dispositions Outgoing Transfer-out De-activated Total Outgoing Net
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty20.pdf - 2021-02-11
[PDF]
Clearance Rate Report - Couunty Wide Report
-activated Total Incoming Total Dispositions Outgoing Transfer-out De-activated Total Outgoing Net
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty21.pdf - 2022-02-22
-activated Total Incoming Total Dispositions Outgoing Transfer-out De-activated Total Outgoing Net
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty21.pdf - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
Clearance rate summary: County and district
-activated Total Incoming Total Dispositions Outgoing Transfer-out De-activated Total Outgoing Net
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty19.pdf - 2020-02-27
-activated Total Incoming Total Dispositions Outgoing Transfer-out De-activated Total Outgoing Net
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty19.pdf - 2020-02-27
[PDF]
Clearance rate summary: County and district
-activated Total Incoming Total Dispositions Outgoing Transfer-out De-activated Total Outgoing Net
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty18.pdf - 2019-02-26
-activated Total Incoming Total Dispositions Outgoing Transfer-out De-activated Total Outgoing Net
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/clearancecounty18.pdf - 2019-02-26
Armin Nankin v. Village of Shorewood
"de novo" in the circuit court. Nankin contends that the statute is unconstitutional because
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17506 - 2005-03-31
"de novo" in the circuit court. Nankin contends that the statute is unconstitutional because
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17506 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Armin Nankin v. Village of Shorewood
trial "de novo" in the circuit court. Nankin contends that the statute is unconstitutional because
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17506 - 2017-09-21
trial "de novo" in the circuit court. Nankin contends that the statute is unconstitutional because
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17506 - 2017-09-21
Carl Jensen v. City of Appleton
for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3255 - 2005-03-31
for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3255 - 2005-03-31
Ralph Lubitz v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
against Lubitz and that the circuit court erred by improperly conducting its own de novo factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15229 - 2005-03-31
against Lubitz and that the circuit court erred by improperly conducting its own de novo factual finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15229 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ΒΆ18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93201 - 2014-09-15
that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ΒΆ18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93201 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
determined that the variances for the stoops, stairwell, and addition were de minimis and required only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61129 - 2014-09-15
determined that the variances for the stoops, stairwell, and addition were de minimis and required only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61129 - 2014-09-15