Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7701 - 7710 of 15226 for 2013.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. We granted the petition for leave to appeal the nonfinal order on September 18, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117398 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Carter, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14) 1 postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174450 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶6 In May 2013, the State filed a petition seeking the termination of the parental rights (TPR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134598 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
on Appeal. As relevant to this appeal, in August 2013, Potkonjak filed a motion to modify his sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163872 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 802.08(2) (2013-14).[2] “Summary judgment materials, including pleadings, depositions, answers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142991 - 2015-06-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
) (2010-11; 2011-12; 2013-14; 2015-16), and from an Nos. 2017AP1519-CR 2017AP1520-CR 2017AP1521
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213936 - 2018-06-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144669 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2) (2013-14). “[W]e draw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134853 - 2015-02-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
going to the jury. Both parties responded “no.” ¶15 On June 11, 2013, the jury determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132809 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
and three years’ extended supervision. ¶9 On August 19, 2013, Olson filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121156 - 2014-09-08