Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7701 - 7710 of 15278 for 2013.
Search results 7701 - 7710 of 15278 for 2013.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 943.32(2) (2013-14),4 939.50(3)(c), 973.01(2)(b)3., 973.01(2)(d)2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237878 - 2019-03-21
supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 943.32(2) (2013-14),4 939.50(3)(c), 973.01(2)(b)3., 973.01(2)(d)2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237878 - 2019-03-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137823 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2013-14). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137823 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2013-14). We will not repeat the well-known methodology here except to observe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164095 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2013-14). We will not repeat the well-known methodology here except to observe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164095 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
v. American Family Ins. Co., 2014 WI App 11, ¶9, 352 Wis. 2d 436, 842 N.W.2d 508 (2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556912 - 2022-08-22
v. American Family Ins. Co., 2014 WI App 11, ¶9, 352 Wis. 2d 436, 842 N.W.2d 508 (2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=556912 - 2022-08-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177051 - 2017-09-21
. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177051 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the divorce. ¶5 Following a June 2013 hearing, the circuit court determined there was a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114810 - 2014-06-16
the divorce. ¶5 Following a June 2013 hearing, the circuit court determined there was a substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114810 - 2014-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Carter, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14) 1 postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174450 - 2017-09-21
. Carter, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14) 1 postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174450 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, pursuant to an agreement dated October 2013 between MPD and the Forest County Potawatomi Community d/b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638203 - 2023-03-28
, pursuant to an agreement dated October 2013 between MPD and the Forest County Potawatomi Community d/b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638203 - 2023-03-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a matter of law. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2013-14). “[W]e draw all reasonable inferences from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134853 - 2017-09-21
as a matter of law. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2) (2013-14). “[W]e draw all reasonable inferences from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
on Appeal. As relevant to this appeal, in August 2013, Potkonjak filed a motion to modify his sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163872 - 2017-09-21
on Appeal. As relevant to this appeal, in August 2013, Potkonjak filed a motion to modify his sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163872 - 2017-09-21

