Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7701 - 7710 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 7701 - 7710 of 69366 for as he.
State v. Norman D. Stapleton
for robbery and burglary. He argues that his trial counsel and appellate counsel were ineffective. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2597 - 2005-03-31
for robbery and burglary. He argues that his trial counsel and appellate counsel were ineffective. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2597 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph L. Young
upon No. 2005AP2598-D 2 his continued practice of law in this state; and (3) he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26021 - 2017-09-21
upon No. 2005AP2598-D 2 his continued practice of law in this state; and (3) he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26021 - 2017-09-21
Eli Frank v.
plea in federal court, the stipulation he entered into with the Board of Attorneys Professional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17092 - 2005-03-31
plea in federal court, the stipulation he entered into with the Board of Attorneys Professional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17092 - 2005-03-31
State v. Demitrius Goodlow
was ineffective for failing to challenge on appeal the trial court’s conclusion that he was not entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20359 - 2005-11-21
was ineffective for failing to challenge on appeal the trial court’s conclusion that he was not entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20359 - 2005-11-21
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin
alleged by affidavit that at the time his guilty plea was entered, he did not recall his attorney
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/negrete.pdf - 2012-01-31
alleged by affidavit that at the time his guilty plea was entered, he did not recall his attorney
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/negrete.pdf - 2012-01-31
State v. Terry L. Jordan
motion. Jordan contends that: (1) he should be granted a new trial because “the trial court crossed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6727 - 2005-03-31
motion. Jordan contends that: (1) he should be granted a new trial because “the trial court crossed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Stacy Wiemeri. He argues the circuit court erred by: (1) denying rather than reserving him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242744 - 2019-06-25
to Stacy Wiemeri. He argues the circuit court erred by: (1) denying rather than reserving him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242744 - 2019-06-25
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Jordan
-2052 2 motion. Jordan contends that: (1) he should be granted a new trial because “the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6727 - 2017-09-20
-2052 2 motion. Jordan contends that: (1) he should be granted a new trial because “the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6727 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but that he might choose not to testify. Defense counsel then asked whether all of the potential jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896652 - 2025-01-02
, but that he might choose not to testify. Defense counsel then asked whether all of the potential jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896652 - 2025-01-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of aggravated battery, and two counts of disorderly conduct. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237875 - 2019-03-26
of aggravated battery, and two counts of disorderly conduct. He also appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237875 - 2019-03-26