Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7701 - 7710 of 9145 for jurors.
Search results 7701 - 7710 of 9145 for jurors.
State v. Rodney A. King
a “juxtaposition” that “could have only outraged the jurors.” He argues that the photograph showing LaBrosse’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15582 - 2005-03-31
a “juxtaposition” that “could have only outraged the jurors.” He argues that the photograph showing LaBrosse’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15582 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
; Sullivan, 216 Wis. 2d at 772-73.[4] Jurors are presumed to have followed the instructions. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139102 - 2015-04-07
; Sullivan, 216 Wis. 2d at 772-73.[4] Jurors are presumed to have followed the instructions. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139102 - 2015-04-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury to re-read) make clear that the court’s answer was not evidence, and jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022512 - 2025-10-14
the jury to re-read) make clear that the court’s answer was not evidence, and jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022512 - 2025-10-14
State v. Jaruthh M. Gathings
in aiding the jurors’ understanding of his testimony. We find that the reasoning applied by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9313 - 2005-03-31
in aiding the jurors’ understanding of his testimony. We find that the reasoning applied by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9313 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
convinces him or her and should convince the jurors.” State v. Cameron, 2016 WI App 54, ¶19, 370 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342779 - 2021-03-09
convinces him or her and should convince the jurors.” State v. Cameron, 2016 WI App 54, ¶19, 370 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342779 - 2021-03-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the concern that its use “may psychologically engender prejudice in the minds of jurors,” see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43443 - 2014-09-15
, the concern that its use “may psychologically engender prejudice in the minds of jurors,” see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43443 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
because they ask jurors to be a “saint” and to perform the job of protecting children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52963 - 2014-09-15
because they ask jurors to be a “saint” and to perform the job of protecting children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52963 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
if each juror found that at least one of the acts had occurred, even if there was no unanimity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90616 - 2014-09-15
if each juror found that at least one of the acts had occurred, even if there was no unanimity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90616 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Shauna L. Conroy v. Marquette University
, the jurors sent several questions to the trial court which prompted the trial court, over the appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11265 - 2017-09-19
, the jurors sent several questions to the trial court which prompted the trial court, over the appellant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11265 - 2017-09-19
State v. Antonio Mays
was taking longer than had been anticipated, which was problematic for jurors who had not planned on a longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19402 - 2005-08-29
was taking longer than had been anticipated, which was problematic for jurors who had not planned on a longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19402 - 2005-08-29