Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7701 - 7710 of 19290 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 7701 - 7710 of 19290 for transfer by affidavit.
Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County
judgment because the County did not present an affidavit relating to the first and third claims in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9894 - 2005-03-31
judgment because the County did not present an affidavit relating to the first and third claims in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a notarized affidavit of indigency. Walker additionally returned the standard form, which informed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74184 - 2014-09-15
a notarized affidavit of indigency. Walker additionally returned the standard form, which informed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74184 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
based upon an affidavit from a newly discovered witness who averred the victim had told her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15845 - 2017-09-21
based upon an affidavit from a newly discovered witness who averred the victim had told her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15845 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
on Taylor’s motion, the parties stipulated that trial counsel could appear by affidavit. In that affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14172 - 2014-09-15
on Taylor’s motion, the parties stipulated that trial counsel could appear by affidavit. In that affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14172 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as required by WIS. STAT. § 801.02(1). 3 Kaul supported his motion with an affidavit stating that he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214614 - 2018-06-20
, as required by WIS. STAT. § 801.02(1). 3 Kaul supported his motion with an affidavit stating that he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214614 - 2018-06-20
State v. Paul J. Koch
concentration. The affidavit in support of the criminal complaint stated: D. WOERPEL, your complainant states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13237 - 2005-03-31
concentration. The affidavit in support of the criminal complaint stated: D. WOERPEL, your complainant states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13237 - 2005-03-31
Donald Lindquist v. Deborah Lindquist
assignment for future maintenance payments.” (Emphasis added.) Deborah’s affidavit in support of her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11419 - 2005-03-31
assignment for future maintenance payments.” (Emphasis added.) Deborah’s affidavit in support of her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11419 - 2005-03-31
Brodhead Trap Club, Inc. v. Rose M. Heath
or fact, we examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13793 - 2005-03-31
or fact, we examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13793 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert L. Collins
the jury’s function to determine witness credibility. In an affidavit in support of the motion, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4439 - 2005-03-31
the jury’s function to determine witness credibility. In an affidavit in support of the motion, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert A. Kerbell v. Otter Creek Builders, LLC
was frivolous. However, in opposition to Kerbell’s motion, Otter Creek submitted an affidavit by Richard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2104 - 2017-09-19
was frivolous. However, in opposition to Kerbell’s motion, Otter Creek submitted an affidavit by Richard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2104 - 2017-09-19