Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 77071 - 77080 of 82576 for simple case.
Search results 77071 - 77080 of 82576 for simple case.
State v. Adrian L. Williams
possible penalties in this case.” Williams was further advised by the trial court that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15283 - 2005-03-31
possible penalties in this case.” Williams was further advised by the trial court that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15283 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135068 - 2015-02-17
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135068 - 2015-02-17
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Conway
, No. 98-0691 3 389 N.W.2d 12, 30 (1986). However, in this case the trial court did not hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13725 - 2014-09-15
, No. 98-0691 3 389 N.W.2d 12, 30 (1986). However, in this case the trial court did not hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of not guilty to all three counts, and the case proceeded to a jury trial. Prior to trial, Wells’ appointed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691522 - 2023-08-16
of not guilty to all three counts, and the case proceeded to a jury trial. Prior to trial, Wells’ appointed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691522 - 2023-08-16
State v. Mandell Ashford
). The case was plea-bargained, and, in return for Ashford's guilty plea to misdemeanor battery as an habitual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13624 - 2005-03-31
). The case was plea-bargained, and, in return for Ashford's guilty plea to misdemeanor battery as an habitual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13624 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670051 - 2023-06-20
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670051 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 292 N.W.2d 615 (1980). In this case, 2 that discretion is guided by WIS. ADMIN CODE § PAC 1.06(7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
, 292 N.W.2d 615 (1980). In this case, 2 that discretion is guided by WIS. ADMIN CODE § PAC 1.06(7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698623 - 2023-09-06
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698623 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
State v. Bruce M. Saks
. Moreover, Saks had already been sentenced to sixty-seven years in another case. The prosecution’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12890 - 2017-09-21
. Moreover, Saks had already been sentenced to sixty-seven years in another case. The prosecution’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12890 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a common sense test. The crucial question is whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81709 - 2014-09-15
is a common sense test. The crucial question is whether the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81709 - 2014-09-15