Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7711 - 7720 of 50071 for our.
Search results 7711 - 7720 of 50071 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513295 - 2022-04-26
a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513295 - 2022-04-26
[PDF]
Eugene Cherry v. Donald Gudmanson
by any reasonable view of the evidence, and we may not substitute our view of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
by any reasonable view of the evidence, and we may not substitute our view of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15925 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
support any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Our review of the Record satisfies us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615611 - 2023-02-01
support any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Our review of the Record satisfies us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615611 - 2023-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476654 - 2022-01-25
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476654 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP1780 2 our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342565 - 2021-03-04
. No. 2018AP1780 2 our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342565 - 2021-03-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with one of our unpublished decisions, State v. Gerondale, Nos. 2009AP1237/1238-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109909 - 2017-09-21
with one of our unpublished decisions, State v. Gerondale, Nos. 2009AP1237/1238-CR, unpublished slip op
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109909 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113217 - 2014-06-03
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113217 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662652 - 2023-05-31
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662652 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238348 - 2019-03-28
. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238348 - 2019-03-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be evaluated as a sexual predator. Our review of the record satisfies us that Jarzynka’s no-contest pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219133 - 2018-09-19
be evaluated as a sexual predator. Our review of the record satisfies us that Jarzynka’s no-contest pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219133 - 2018-09-19