Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7711 - 7720 of 50100 for our.
Search results 7711 - 7720 of 50100 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Edward A. Stoetzel
rule. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 926 (1984). Under the facts and our holding, the good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10830 - 2017-09-20
rule. United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 926 (1984). Under the facts and our holding, the good
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10830 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Geneva, Inc. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237780 - 2019-03-20
Geneva, Inc. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237780 - 2019-03-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of methamphetamine. Burks was advised of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174581 - 2017-09-21
of methamphetamine. Burks was advised of his right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174581 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercise of sentencing discretion. Our review of the appellate record satisfies us that the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817858 - 2024-06-26
exercise of sentencing discretion. Our review of the appellate record satisfies us that the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817858 - 2024-06-26
Jimmy Bridges v. Gerald Berge
affect our review of the merits. However, if we were to affirm on the merits, we would then review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2761 - 2005-03-31
affect our review of the merits. However, if we were to affirm on the merits, we would then review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jackie Green
to support his argument, we affirm the trial court’s order denying additional credit. ¶2 Our understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16207 - 2017-09-21
to support his argument, we affirm the trial court’s order denying additional credit. ¶2 Our understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16207 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
punishments imposed. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any potentially meritorious issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92117 - 2013-01-29
punishments imposed. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any potentially meritorious issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92117 - 2013-01-29
Allen P. Tappa v. Gregory T. Barutha
not be repeated here. Our review is de novo. Id. Material questions of fact exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8375 - 2005-03-31
not be repeated here. Our review is de novo. Id. Material questions of fact exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8375 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026920 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian Mallory
the supreme court reversed our decision in Mentek on other grounds, 1 it did not specifically reverse our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6629 - 2017-09-19
the supreme court reversed our decision in Mentek on other grounds, 1 it did not specifically reverse our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6629 - 2017-09-19