Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7721 - 7730 of 57351 for id.
Search results 7721 - 7730 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Barnes
of a new factor. See id. If he or she does so, then the trial court must determine whether the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13395 - 2017-09-21
of a new factor. See id. If he or she does so, then the trial court must determine whether the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13395 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea. Id. While the circuit court has “significant discretion” in conducting the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47143 - 2010-02-17
the plea. Id. While the circuit court has “significant discretion” in conducting the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47143 - 2010-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
that they are not clearly erroneous. See id. Rather, the parties dispute whether the findings support the legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29106 - 2007-05-22
that they are not clearly erroneous. See id. Rather, the parties dispute whether the findings support the legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29106 - 2007-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a new factor. See id., ¶35. To prevail, a defendant must satisfy a two-prong test that requires
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597720 - 2022-12-06
of a new factor. See id., ¶35. To prevail, a defendant must satisfy a two-prong test that requires
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597720 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
State v. Richard G. Lawrence
between the defendant and his lawyer which exhibits the defendant’s knowledge.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3535 - 2017-09-19
between the defendant and his lawyer which exhibits the defendant’s knowledge.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3535 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kurt A. Loewen
court's findings of historical fact will not be upset unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. at 283-84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8210 - 2005-03-31
court's findings of historical fact will not be upset unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. at 283-84
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8210 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law. Id. Second, if a new factor is present, the trial court must determine “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91922 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law. Id. Second, if a new factor is present, the trial court must determine “whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91922 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶35, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828. The analysis involves a two-step process. Id., ¶36. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87625 - 2012-10-01
, ¶35, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828. The analysis involves a two-step process. Id., ¶36. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87625 - 2012-10-01
Nicholas R. Ball v. Cooperative Educational Service Agency No. 6
be specifically raised or deemed waived.” Id. The Cords opinion is significant to the present case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11459 - 2005-03-31
be specifically raised or deemed waived.” Id. The Cords opinion is significant to the present case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11459 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
could reasonably evaluate their credibility and the reliability of their information. Id., ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53539 - 2010-08-23
could reasonably evaluate their credibility and the reliability of their information. Id., ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53539 - 2010-08-23