Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7741 - 7750 of 15550 for fee.
Search results 7741 - 7750 of 15550 for fee.
[PDF]
Court system expenditures 20-21
revenue (fees or assessments), 12.9%; and • other sources, 0.5% (see Figure 1). As shown in Figure 1
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures20-21.pdf - 2022-03-01
revenue (fees or assessments), 12.9%; and • other sources, 0.5% (see Figure 1). As shown in Figure 1
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures20-21.pdf - 2022-03-01
[PDF]
Court system 2022-2023 expenditures
of sources: • general purpose revenue (state tax dollars), 88.0%; • program revenue (fees or assessments
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures22-23.pdf - 2024-01-30
of sources: • general purpose revenue (state tax dollars), 88.0%; • program revenue (fees or assessments
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures22-23.pdf - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the filing fee. The Lees eventually paid the fee in August 2010. The clerk of circuit court filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87088 - 2014-09-15
the filing fee. The Lees eventually paid the fee in August 2010. The clerk of circuit court filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87088 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
because the Lees did not pay the filing fee. The Lees eventually paid the fee in August 2010. The clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87088 - 2012-09-17
because the Lees did not pay the filing fee. The Lees eventually paid the fee in August 2010. The clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87088 - 2012-09-17
February 1, 2000
to the Bar and payment of the Related Fees 08/28/2008 08-23 In the Matter of the Petition for Amendment
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33928 - 2008-09-01
to the Bar and payment of the Related Fees 08/28/2008 08-23 In the Matter of the Petition for Amendment
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33928 - 2008-09-01
CA Blank Order
of attorney fees, it appears that these arguments are being made for the first time on appeal, and therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93989 - 2013-03-07
of attorney fees, it appears that these arguments are being made for the first time on appeal, and therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93989 - 2013-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
attorney fees. Therefore, we remand for a determination of the Village’s costs and attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30239 - 2007-09-12
attorney fees. Therefore, we remand for a determination of the Village’s costs and attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30239 - 2007-09-12
[PDF]
Updated: September 2, 2008
Fees 08/28/2008 08-23 In the Matter of the Petition for Amendment of Supreme Court Rules (SCR
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33928 - 2014-09-15
Fees 08/28/2008 08-23 In the Matter of the Petition for Amendment of Supreme Court Rules (SCR
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33928 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Town of Lyndon v. Robert A. Oines
that River Bay had blocked access to public parking areas and had charged fees for use of the public boat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5730 - 2017-09-19
that River Bay had blocked access to public parking areas and had charged fees for use of the public boat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5730 - 2017-09-19
Edward A. Hannan v. Thomas W. Godfrey
fees received by the partnership through January 1998 for work done by the plaintiffs through April 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15460 - 2005-03-31
fees received by the partnership through January 1998 for work done by the plaintiffs through April 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15460 - 2005-03-31