Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 77441 - 77450 of 82563 for simple case.
Search results 77441 - 77450 of 82563 for simple case.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656577 - 2023-05-16
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656577 - 2023-05-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
limitation is a limit on recovery, not a bar that denies the court jurisdiction over cases in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33813 - 2014-09-15
limitation is a limit on recovery, not a bar that denies the court jurisdiction over cases in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33813 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael John Noonan
of this case, the court finds that the Florence County Sheriff[’s] Department did incur expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15034 - 2017-09-21
of this case, the court finds that the Florence County Sheriff[’s] Department did incur expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15034 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 113
), the board may add a surcharge in individual cases if it finds that extraordinary costs have been
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88975 - 2014-09-15
), the board may add a surcharge in individual cases if it finds that extraordinary costs have been
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88975 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Melissa C. Lenzen v. Thomas A. Barndt
was No. 96-1855-FT -5- very brief. In view of the other facts of the case, which were more fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11038 - 2017-09-19
was No. 96-1855-FT -5- very brief. In view of the other facts of the case, which were more fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11038 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lamont D. Tate
a preliminary hearing. See id. “[R]esolution of doubtful or marginal cases regarding [an issuing magistrate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15888 - 2005-03-31
a preliminary hearing. See id. “[R]esolution of doubtful or marginal cases regarding [an issuing magistrate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15888 - 2005-03-31
Lynda D. Dahlke v. James D. Dahlke
to and considered the facts of the case and reasoned its way to a conclusion that is one a reasonable judge could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15575 - 2005-03-31
to and considered the facts of the case and reasoned its way to a conclusion that is one a reasonable judge could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15575 - 2005-03-31
State v. William Ray Toles
an issue that would have required distinguishing several adverse cases with similar facts. See Duckworth v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6843 - 2005-03-31
an issue that would have required distinguishing several adverse cases with similar facts. See Duckworth v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6843 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a reasonable police officer to believe, in this case, that the defendant was operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129453 - 2014-11-19
a reasonable police officer to believe, in this case, that the defendant was operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129453 - 2014-11-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the established propositions of the case. See State v. Jackson, 216 Wis. 2d 646, 667, 575 N.W.2d 475 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34499 - 2014-09-15
the established propositions of the case. See State v. Jackson, 216 Wis. 2d 646, 667, 575 N.W.2d 475 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34499 - 2014-09-15