Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 77471 - 77480 of 82563 for simple case.
Search results 77471 - 77480 of 82563 for simple case.
[PDF]
State v. Michael John Noonan
of this case, the court finds that the Florence County Sheriff[’s] Department did incur expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15034 - 2017-09-21
of this case, the court finds that the Florence County Sheriff[’s] Department did incur expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15034 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 113
), the board may add a surcharge in individual cases if it finds that extraordinary costs have been
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88975 - 2014-09-15
), the board may add a surcharge in individual cases if it finds that extraordinary costs have been
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88975 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Melissa C. Lenzen v. Thomas A. Barndt
was No. 96-1855-FT -5- very brief. In view of the other facts of the case, which were more fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11038 - 2017-09-19
was No. 96-1855-FT -5- very brief. In view of the other facts of the case, which were more fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11038 - 2017-09-19
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36493 - 2012-12-05
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36493 - 2012-12-05
State v. Lamont D. Tate
a preliminary hearing. See id. “[R]esolution of doubtful or marginal cases regarding [an issuing magistrate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15888 - 2005-03-31
a preliminary hearing. See id. “[R]esolution of doubtful or marginal cases regarding [an issuing magistrate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15888 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The former governor’s policy directive is irrelevant to this case. First, evidence of the directive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49112 - 2013-08-15
The former governor’s policy directive is irrelevant to this case. First, evidence of the directive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49112 - 2013-08-15
Lynda D. Dahlke v. James D. Dahlke
to and considered the facts of the case and reasoned its way to a conclusion that is one a reasonable judge could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15575 - 2005-03-31
to and considered the facts of the case and reasoned its way to a conclusion that is one a reasonable judge could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15575 - 2005-03-31
State v. William Ray Toles
an issue that would have required distinguishing several adverse cases with similar facts. See Duckworth v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6843 - 2005-03-31
an issue that would have required distinguishing several adverse cases with similar facts. See Duckworth v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6843 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
of the statute. This argument has no support in the case law interpreting and applying the statute. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
of the statute. This argument has no support in the case law interpreting and applying the statute. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a reasonable police officer to believe, in this case, that the defendant was operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129453 - 2014-11-19
a reasonable police officer to believe, in this case, that the defendant was operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129453 - 2014-11-19