Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7751 - 7760 of 58618 for speedy trial.
Search results 7751 - 7760 of 58618 for speedy trial.
Michelle L. Peters v. Joseph A. Peters
, arguing that the trial court erroneously valued her former husband, Joseph’s, interest in a family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3909 - 2005-03-31
, arguing that the trial court erroneously valued her former husband, Joseph’s, interest in a family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3909 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Melanie A.W. v. Patrick L.W.
, Melanie.2 The mother’s petition was filed on March 27, 2000, and the matter proceeded to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3366 - 2017-09-19
, Melanie.2 The mother’s petition was filed on March 27, 2000, and the matter proceeded to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3366 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert A. Kron v. Harry Demorest
in this action arising out of a boundary dispute. Demorest argues that the trial court erroneously determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7271 - 2017-09-20
in this action arising out of a boundary dispute. Demorest argues that the trial court erroneously determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7271 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jill J. Kunish-Wolff
motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Kunish-Wolff was convicted for her role
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12311 - 2005-03-31
motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Kunish-Wolff was convicted for her role
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12311 - 2005-03-31
Melanie A.W. v. Patrick L.W.
, and the matter proceeded to a jury trial on May 23. ¶2 Patrick argues the trial court erred by: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3366 - 2005-03-31
, and the matter proceeded to a jury trial on May 23. ¶2 Patrick argues the trial court erred by: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3366 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patricia Wathen v. Robert Moore
. He argues that the trial court failed to make the requisite findings when it departed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12386 - 2017-09-21
. He argues that the trial court failed to make the requisite findings when it departed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12386 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). 1 Prior to sentencing, Lee moved to withdraw his pleas, asserting that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185129 - 2017-09-21
). 1 Prior to sentencing, Lee moved to withdraw his pleas, asserting that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185129 - 2017-09-21
Anthony Ambrose v. Continental Insurance Company
. The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that issue preclusion[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10880 - 2005-03-31
. The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that issue preclusion[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10880 - 2005-03-31
State v. Zebelum Smith
).[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4095 - 2005-03-31
).[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4095 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brian E. Davis v. Nationsbank, N.A.
in favor of Nationsbank, N.A., et al. Davis claims: (1) the trial court erred when it refused to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2388 - 2017-09-19
in favor of Nationsbank, N.A., et al. Davis claims: (1) the trial court erred when it refused to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2388 - 2017-09-19