Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7771 - 7780 of 20925 for word.

[PDF] NOTICE
, but by the time the court proceeding started, there was no word that the deputies had made any contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36279 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶¶28-32, 315 Wis. 2d 653, 761 N.W.2d 612. “Although cases sometimes use the words ‘forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332438 - 2021-02-09

[PDF] Karen C. Martin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
. The Martins concede that if, in the words of their main brief on this appeal, “the ‘regular use’ exclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2969 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was released from jail, his mother “took him home and he was—it was—excuse the word—it was a disaster. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679069 - 2023-07-19

[PDF] State v. Norman L. Dismuke
including what has been communicated by the police officers, either by their words or actions, shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5551 - 2017-09-19

Highland Manor Associates v. Michele Bast
word should be looked at so as not to render any portion of the statute superfluous.[5] But "courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16680 - 2013-01-01

State v. Norman L. Dismuke
by their words or actions, shall be controlling under the objective test. State v. Swanson, 164 Wis. 2d 437, 446
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5551 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brandon L. Mason
meaning, except that technical or specially-defined words or phrases are given their technical or special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6957 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ervin Burris
this as a motion by the state or by the department for modification of the Court’s prior order”—in other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13204 - 2005-03-31

Rogers Development, Inc. v. Rock County Planning and Development Committee
and approved usage of the words chosen by the legislature. Wis. Stat. § 990.01(1); see also State v. Gilbert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4787 - 2005-03-31