Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 77791 - 77800 of 84403 for simple case search.
Search results 77791 - 77800 of 84403 for simple case search.
Stupar River LLC v. Town of Linwood Board of Review
;” the case was remanded to the Board for a reassessment for the 2002 tax year. The Board appeals. STANDARD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17803 - 2005-05-02
;” the case was remanded to the Board for a reassessment for the 2002 tax year. The Board appeals. STANDARD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17803 - 2005-05-02
Phyllis M. Landis v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
2000 WI App 164 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2231 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 164 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2231 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the decision of the board of Zoning Appeals for the City of Oshkosh. In this zoning case, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50544 - 2014-09-15
the decision of the board of Zoning Appeals for the City of Oshkosh. In this zoning case, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50544 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Stupar River LLC v. Town of Linwood Board of Review
the tax assessment, concluding the valuation “was not made on the statutory basis;” the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17803 - 2017-09-21
the tax assessment, concluding the valuation “was not made on the statutory basis;” the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17803 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Mary G.
of the parent or expectant mother and other relevant circumstances of the case. b. That the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4698 - 2017-09-19
of the parent or expectant mother and other relevant circumstances of the case. b. That the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4698 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
] states: “The court shall reverse or remand the case to the agency if it finds that the agency’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56776 - 2010-11-15
] states: “The court shall reverse or remand the case to the agency if it finds that the agency’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56776 - 2010-11-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the two at issue in this case, to Devine and C C Electric but not to the mortgage company.[3] Regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78035 - 2012-02-13
the two at issue in this case, to Devine and C C Electric but not to the mortgage company.[3] Regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78035 - 2012-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to forty-five days, see § 51.20(13)(g)2., and, in this case, the court ordered a six-month commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104752 - 2017-09-21
to forty-five days, see § 51.20(13)(g)2., and, in this case, the court ordered a six-month commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104752 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the case pursuant to a stipulation, and following K & D’s stipulated dismissal, only KJS’s business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1125609 - 2026-06-02
the case pursuant to a stipulation, and following K & D’s stipulated dismissal, only KJS’s business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1125609 - 2026-06-02
CA Blank Order
in this case is disproportionate or shocking. We conclude that a challenge to the trial court’s exercise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138753 - 2015-03-26
in this case is disproportionate or shocking. We conclude that a challenge to the trial court’s exercise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138753 - 2015-03-26