Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7781 - 7790 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 7781 - 7790 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Kahl
not address Kahl’s additional contention that his consent under the implied consent law does not extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4133 - 2017-09-20
not address Kahl’s additional contention that his consent under the implied consent law does not extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4133 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and eight years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251343 - 2019-12-18
and eight years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251343 - 2019-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and thirty years of extended supervision. It also ordered Evans to pay $34,026.90 in restitution after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488671 - 2022-03-02
and thirty years of extended supervision. It also ordered Evans to pay $34,026.90 in restitution after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488671 - 2022-03-02
[PDF]
State v. Roy E. Ridener
and was informed of his right to file a response. Ridener has not responded although the court extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9598 - 2017-09-19
and was informed of his right to file a response. Ridener has not responded although the court extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9598 - 2017-09-19
Ronald S. Schilling v. Patricia Goodrich
that the 1990 order did not extend to all future security classification decisions, and that prison officials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3048 - 2005-03-31
that the 1990 order did not extend to all future security classification decisions, and that prison officials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3048 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of consecutive and concurrent sentences totaling eight years of initial confinement and eight years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053123 - 2025-12-23
of consecutive and concurrent sentences totaling eight years of initial confinement and eight years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053123 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, an enhanced sentence due to Lucas’s status as a repeat offender). Lucas received
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213777 - 2018-06-06
of extended supervision, an enhanced sentence due to Lucas’s status as a repeat offender). Lucas received
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213777 - 2018-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sentence of twelve years’ initial confinement and fifteen years’ extended supervision. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341320 - 2021-03-02
a sentence of twelve years’ initial confinement and fifteen years’ extended supervision. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341320 - 2021-03-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
imposed a sentence of three years of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97079 - 2014-09-15
imposed a sentence of three years of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97079 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of extended supervision. Winchel argues that the sentences were excessive and unduly harsh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156664 - 2017-09-21
years of extended supervision. Winchel argues that the sentences were excessive and unduly harsh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156664 - 2017-09-21