Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7791 - 7800 of 16451 for commenting.

Gary C. Sukowatey v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
without commenting on the board’s other reasons. See id. We conclude that the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15759 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
by law.” Id. However, in a comment to this substitute paragraph, the Committee cautioned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913090 - 2025-02-12

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
, the point of the court’s comment remains the same: Michael has an extensive history of offenses and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28032 - 2007-02-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
hearing, the prosecution offered no further comment on the plea recommendation. The court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95750 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that these comments show an erroneous exercise of discretion. Chase points to Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133580 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
that actually occurred. ¶9 In addition, Weathers argues that the officer’s comment is the functional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27317 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and children … this wasn’t his first encounter with interest in children.”2 Commenting on Roth’s especially
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674613 - 2023-07-05

[PDF] State v. Thomas F.w.
not objected to or commented on the State's reference to the order and its inclusion in the appendix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9582 - 2017-09-19

State v. Tina H.
not play a role in Tina’s failure to parent her children, and we dismiss this claim without further comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13019 - 2005-03-31

State v. Stephen L. Grant
(1988), not an impermissible comment on the veracity of the victims, precluded by State v. Haseltine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10958 - 2005-03-31