Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 77911 - 77920 of 83758 for simple case search.
Search results 77911 - 77920 of 83758 for simple case search.
[PDF]
Disposition Table for March & April 2013
2013 WI 40 CASE DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96440 - 2014-09-15
2013 WI 40 CASE DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96440 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Disposition table - November 2017
2017 WI 101 CASE DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS TO WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT DECIDED November 2017
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204767 - 2017-12-05
2017 WI 101 CASE DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS TO WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT DECIDED November 2017
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204767 - 2017-12-05
[PDF]
Disposition table - February 2021
2022 WI 84 CASE DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS TO WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT DECIDED February 2021
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595242 - 2022-11-25
2022 WI 84 CASE DISPOSITION OF PETITIONS TO WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT DECIDED February 2021
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595242 - 2022-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony would have addressed Poniewaz’s issues with balance in general. But the State’s impairment case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045363 - 2025-12-03
testimony would have addressed Poniewaz’s issues with balance in general. But the State’s impairment case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045363 - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and Records, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981681 - 2025-07-16
of the briefs and Records, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=981681 - 2025-07-16
State v. Randal M. Woodard
had. That was the real controversy in this case, and that controversy was fully tried. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5504 - 2005-03-31
had. That was the real controversy in this case, and that controversy was fully tried. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5504 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087514 - 2026-03-10
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087514 - 2026-03-10
State v. Emmanuel D. Johnson
22, 26 (Ct. App. 1995). In this case, even accepting Johnson's version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11142 - 2005-03-31
22, 26 (Ct. App. 1995). In this case, even accepting Johnson's version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11142 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Van Ryzin
situation inherent in that case. There, a pathologist testified that the lab assistant performed lab
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14431 - 2017-09-21
situation inherent in that case. There, a pathologist testified that the lab assistant performed lab
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14431 - 2017-09-21
Frank C. Kesselring v. Ellen K. Kesselring
by the evidence. The evidence supporting the finding includes a case account statement documenting Frank’s child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5891 - 2005-03-31
by the evidence. The evidence supporting the finding includes a case account statement documenting Frank’s child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5891 - 2005-03-31