Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 77961 - 77970 of 84403 for simple case search.
Search results 77961 - 77970 of 84403 for simple case search.
[PDF]
August 2006 Table of Unpublished Opinions
except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26483 - 2017-09-21
except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In his reply brief, Ramirez concedes that Crawford does not apply to his case. No. 2013AP563
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109487 - 2017-09-21
In his reply brief, Ramirez concedes that Crawford does not apply to his case. No. 2013AP563
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109487 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for reconsideration. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
for reconsideration. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
” in § 769.611. Rather, it refers to the issuing state, which in this case is Wyoming. Therefore, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26660 - 2006-10-02
” in § 769.611. Rather, it refers to the issuing state, which in this case is Wyoming. Therefore, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26660 - 2006-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the offenses in this case is in the list of excluded crimes.” Counsel nonetheless concludes that Carthage’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218488 - 2018-08-29
of the offenses in this case is in the list of excluded crimes.” Counsel nonetheless concludes that Carthage’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218488 - 2018-08-29
State v. Allen F. Ringelstetter
is not determinative, because probable cause is based on the totality of the circumstances. In this case the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6000 - 2005-03-31
is not determinative, because probable cause is based on the totality of the circumstances. In this case the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6000 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650283 - 2023-05-03
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650283 - 2023-05-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1129847 - 2026-06-11
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1129847 - 2026-06-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the evidence presented—including testimony from S.N.K., her case worker, the visitation supervisor, and J.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051352 - 2025-12-16
on the evidence presented—including testimony from S.N.K., her case worker, the visitation supervisor, and J.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051352 - 2025-12-16
CA Blank Order
the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142819 - 2015-06-02
the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142819 - 2015-06-02