Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 781 - 790 of 6963 for a u.
Search results 781 - 790 of 6963 for a u.
State v. Thomas W. Reimann
was imposed in violation of the U. S. Constitution or the constitution or laws of this state, that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13741 - 2005-03-31
was imposed in violation of the U. S. Constitution or the constitution or laws of this state, that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
plea,” and that “[u]nder these circumstances, as a matter of law his plea was neither knowing nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12275 - 2017-09-21
plea,” and that “[u]nder these circumstances, as a matter of law his plea was neither knowing nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a conjunction that is commonly “[u]sed to indicate the second of two alternatives.” Applying this common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103326 - 2017-09-21
a conjunction that is commonly “[u]sed to indicate the second of two alternatives.” Applying this common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103326 - 2017-09-21
State v. David V. Pugh, Sr.
to arrest Pugh for driving while “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant … to a degree which renders [one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31
to arrest Pugh for driving while “[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant … to a degree which renders [one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Malcolm M. Mumm
by law.” Sec. 968.10(6). ¶8 The Implied Consent Law states, in part, that “[u]pon arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3415 - 2017-09-19
by law.” Sec. 968.10(6). ¶8 The Implied Consent Law states, in part, that “[u]pon arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3415 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patrick R. Bell
around. He looked on Juneau [Avenue], saw a squad, made a U-turn, started to walk down 13th Street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12929 - 2017-09-21
around. He looked on Juneau [Avenue], saw a squad, made a U-turn, started to walk down 13th Street
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12929 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Damien L. Henning
not challenge the propriety of the officers' initial contact with him. He argues, however, that "[u]nder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12885 - 2017-09-21
not challenge the propriety of the officers' initial contact with him. He argues, however, that "[u]nder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12885 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
from the curb, make a legal U-turn and proceed westbound following behind the officer’s squad car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27979 - 2014-09-15
from the curb, make a legal U-turn and proceed westbound following behind the officer’s squad car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27979 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ruth M. Davis
)(a) (“[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant … to a degree which renders [one] incapable of safely driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19140 - 2005-07-27
)(a) (“[u]nder the influence of an intoxicant … to a degree which renders [one] incapable of safely driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19140 - 2005-07-27
State v. Damien L. Henning
' initial contact with him. He argues, however, that "[u]nder the totality of the circumstances known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12885 - 2005-03-31
' initial contact with him. He argues, however, that "[u]nder the totality of the circumstances known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12885 - 2005-03-31