Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 781 - 790 of 4110 for in q.
Search results 781 - 790 of 4110 for in q.
State v. La Rance Thacker
-examination of a witness called by Fobbs: Q. Now, you and [the victim] in September had known each other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7901 - 2011-06-08
-examination of a witness called by Fobbs: Q. Now, you and [the victim] in September had known each other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7901 - 2011-06-08
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J. H.
U.S. 1, 18 (1999)). ¶11 The record reflects the following examination of Austin by Joseph: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6181 - 2017-09-19
U.S. 1, 18 (1999)). ¶11 The record reflects the following examination of Austin by Joseph: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6181 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patricia LaBelle
questions, LaBelle testified, in part: Q: [] Did you believe that your freedom was limited in any way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13704 - 2014-09-15
questions, LaBelle testified, in part: Q: [] Did you believe that your freedom was limited in any way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13704 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J. Hammill
, the following exchange occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24997 - 2017-09-21
, the following exchange occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony 2 : Q: I guess based on the additional inquiry of the judge, is there any change in your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135507 - 2017-09-21
testimony 2 : Q: I guess based on the additional inquiry of the judge, is there any change in your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135507 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph J. Hammill
occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92? A. No. Q. Is that a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24997 - 2006-06-27
occurred: Q. [Y]ou don’t recall anything about being in court on May 13th, ’92? A. No. Q. Is that a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24997 - 2006-06-27
State v. Joseph J. H.
by Joseph: Q: Okay. Now, you’ve told some people that [Joseph] tried to harm you, right? A: Yah. Q: Do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6181 - 2005-03-31
by Joseph: Q: Okay. Now, you’ve told some people that [Joseph] tried to harm you, right? A: Yah. Q: Do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6181 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John A. Jipson
: Q: You knew [the charge] involved sexual intercourse? A: That’s what [the victim] was claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6335 - 2017-09-19
: Q: You knew [the charge] involved sexual intercourse? A: That’s what [the victim] was claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6335 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
intersect. During redirect examination, and after consulting a map, Prokop corrected his testimony[2]: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
intersect. During redirect examination, and after consulting a map, Prokop corrected his testimony[2]: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
State v. Lawrence J. Fields
. ¶5 The prosecutor asked Metoxen why he stopped the vehicle. The transcript reads: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2383 - 2005-03-31
. ¶5 The prosecutor asked Metoxen why he stopped the vehicle. The transcript reads: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2383 - 2005-03-31