Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 781 - 790 of 4121 for in q.
Search results 781 - 790 of 4121 for in q.
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. Q. Would the force be applied elsewhere? A. Yes. Q. Do you know whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68296 - 2011-07-25
relief. Q. Would the force be applied elsewhere? A. Yes. Q. Do you know whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68296 - 2011-07-25
State v. La Rance Thacker
-examination of a witness called by Fobbs: Q. Now, you and [the victim] in September had known each other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7901 - 2005-03-31
-examination of a witness called by Fobbs: Q. Now, you and [the victim] in September had known each other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7901 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2015-16 version. No. 2017AP125 4 Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207940 - 2018-02-07
All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2015-16 version. No. 2017AP125 4 Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207940 - 2018-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
intersect. During redirect examination, and after consulting a map, Prokop corrected his testimony[2]: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
intersect. During redirect examination, and after consulting a map, Prokop corrected his testimony[2]: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135507 - 2015-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Joseph J. H.
U.S. 1, 18 (1999)). ¶11 The record reflects the following examination of Austin by Joseph: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6181 - 2017-09-19
U.S. 1, 18 (1999)). ¶11 The record reflects the following examination of Austin by Joseph: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6181 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John A. Jipson
: Q: You knew [the charge] involved sexual intercourse? A: That’s what [the victim] was claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6335 - 2017-09-19
: Q: You knew [the charge] involved sexual intercourse? A: That’s what [the victim] was claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6335 - 2017-09-19
State v. John A. Jipson
plea of no contest to the charged offense. The relevant testimony is as follows: Q: You knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6335 - 2005-03-31
plea of no contest to the charged offense. The relevant testimony is as follows: Q: You knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony 2 : Q: I guess based on the additional inquiry of the judge, is there any change in your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135507 - 2017-09-21
testimony 2 : Q: I guess based on the additional inquiry of the judge, is there any change in your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135507 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 138
exchange: Q: And were you able to feel the content in the front pants pocket through those jeans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33728 - 2014-09-15
exchange: Q: And were you able to feel the content in the front pants pocket through those jeans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33728 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of proposed medications with [Mary].” The following exchange then took place: Q. Did you talk with her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107371 - 2017-09-21
of proposed medications with [Mary].” The following exchange then took place: Q. Did you talk with her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107371 - 2017-09-21