Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 781 - 790 of 15294 for probate.
Search results 781 - 790 of 15294 for probate.
The Estate of Ann M. Ernst v. Dennis John Ernst
action and that the evidence does not support the probate court’s conclusion. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12976 - 2005-03-31
action and that the evidence does not support the probate court’s conclusion. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12976 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian C. Wegner
exercised its discretion when it sentenced him after probation revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion when it sentenced him after probation revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16239 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andres Godina
assumptions about the probation agent’s recommendation. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13092 - 2005-03-31
assumptions about the probation agent’s recommendation. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13092 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andres Godina
assumptions about the probation agent’s recommendation. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31
assumptions about the probation agent’s recommendation. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian C. Wegner
it sentenced him after probation No. 99-3079-CR 2 revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16239 - 2017-09-21
it sentenced him after probation No. 99-3079-CR 2 revocation. We disagree. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16239 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to consider the mandatory sentencing factors and implicitly rejected probation with a misunderstanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350381 - 2021-03-31
to consider the mandatory sentencing factors and implicitly rejected probation with a misunderstanding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350381 - 2021-03-31
[PDF]
Dante R. Voss v. David H. Schwarz
a certiorari petition for review of the revocation of his probation and a habeas corpus petition for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19335 - 2017-09-21
a certiorari petition for review of the revocation of his probation and a habeas corpus petition for review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19335 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
after revocation of his probation. Dennis Schertz, Voss’s appointed counsel, filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300358 - 2020-10-29
after revocation of his probation. Dennis Schertz, Voss’s appointed counsel, filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300358 - 2020-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Carl Simonetto
, challenges a condition of probation that he not “go where children may congregate” as being vague
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15166 - 2017-09-21
, challenges a condition of probation that he not “go where children may congregate” as being vague
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15166 - 2017-09-21
State v. Frances Nienhardt
probation. We affirm the judgment because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31
probation. We affirm the judgment because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8285 - 2005-03-31