Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7801 - 7810 of 50070 for our.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of its sentencing discretion must No. 2013AP607-CRNM 3 overcome our presumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125431 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
contends that his sentence was unduly harsh. Based upon our review No. 2018AP1141-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236567 - 2019-03-06

[PDF] State v. Steven A. Rusch
conclusions and raising additional issues. Upon our No. 95-2571-CR-NM -2- independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9684 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
. Heckert appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133147 - 2015-01-20

CA Blank Order
by denying his collateral attack of one of his prior countable offenses. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108908 - 2014-03-10

CA Blank Order
our presumption that the sentence was reasonable. State v. Ramuta, 2003 WI App 80, ¶23, 261 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125431 - 2014-10-27

[PDF] State v. Jason A. Krysheski
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11918 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
. Joseph C. Athans appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94400 - 2013-03-26

State v. Edward A. Stoetzel
the facts and our holding, the good faith exception would not apply in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10830 - 2005-03-31

Dennis E. Jones v. Gary R. McCaughtry
was not telling the truth. A committee’s statement sufficiently articulates its reasons for purposes of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10437 - 2005-03-31