Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7801 - 7810 of 63537 for records.
Search results 7801 - 7810 of 63537 for records.
State v. Harry Montey
the error at the post-judgment hearing. The court then concluded that the DOC records were admissible under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13694 - 2005-03-31
the error at the post-judgment hearing. The court then concluded that the DOC records were admissible under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13694 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the reports and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92254 - 2014-09-15
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the reports and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92254 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is 1 WISCONSIN STAT. § 706.08(1)(a) provides that “every conveyance that is not recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163454 - 2017-09-21
is 1 WISCONSIN STAT. § 706.08(1)(a) provides that “every conveyance that is not recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163454 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
criminal record in the affidavit supporting the warrant. ¶6 At the motion hearing, a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85239 - 2012-07-24
criminal record in the affidavit supporting the warrant. ¶6 At the motion hearing, a police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85239 - 2012-07-24
Vonnie D. Darby v. Jon Litscher
in the record that Darby challenged his amended judgment of conviction on this basis. Furthermore, at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5160 - 2005-03-31
in the record that Darby challenged his amended judgment of conviction on this basis. Furthermore, at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5160 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145090 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145090 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of sentencing that the record be expunged upon successful completion of the sentence if the court determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66793 - 2011-06-27
of sentencing that the record be expunged upon successful completion of the sentence if the court determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66793 - 2011-06-27
Randall and Roberta Spence v. Thomas and Diane Kolodzienski
them; (3) the record discloses issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment; and (4) further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5190 - 2005-03-31
them; (3) the record discloses issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment; and (4) further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5190 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, the written judgment failed to clarify that ambiguity, and the full record demonstrates that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117364 - 2014-07-16
, the written judgment failed to clarify that ambiguity, and the full record demonstrates that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117364 - 2014-07-16
[PDF]
State v. Lindell Joe
the charges against him. He also asserts that the trial court erred by excluding tape recorded messages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7895 - 2017-09-19
the charges against him. He also asserts that the trial court erred by excluding tape recorded messages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7895 - 2017-09-19