Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7801 - 7810 of 64289 for records/1000.
Search results 7801 - 7810 of 64289 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539615 - 2022-06-30
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgments
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539615 - 2022-06-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170279 - 2017-09-21
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald F. Greeno
independent review of the record, we conclude that Attorney Frantz's analysis of the issues is correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8811 - 2017-09-19
independent review of the record, we conclude that Attorney Frantz's analysis of the issues is correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8811 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
several arguments related to the administrative record returned by the Department of Corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81185 - 2014-09-15
several arguments related to the administrative record returned by the Department of Corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81185 - 2014-09-15
State v. Titus Graham
it inaccurately characterized his criminal history. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6687 - 2005-03-31
it inaccurately characterized his criminal history. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6687 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522789 - 2022-05-19
dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522789 - 2022-05-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165253 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165253 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136720 - 2017-09-21
2 reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136720 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and a subsequent petition for a writ of error. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618565 - 2023-02-07
and a subsequent petition for a writ of error. Based upon our review of the briefs and records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618565 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181566 - 2017-09-21
right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181566 - 2017-09-21