Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78071 - 78080 of 84398 for simple case search.
Search results 78071 - 78080 of 84398 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing criteria applied to the facts of this case. See State v. Brown, 2006 WI 131, ¶26, 298 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871244 - 2024-11-05
sentencing criteria applied to the facts of this case. See State v. Brown, 2006 WI 131, ¶26, 298 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871244 - 2024-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 The order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907336 - 2025-02-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 The order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907336 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39-46, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064976 - 2026-01-21
their application to this case. See generally State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39-46, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064976 - 2026-01-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the evidence presented—including testimony from S.N.K., her case worker, the visitation supervisor, and J.K
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051352 - 2025-12-16
on the evidence presented—including testimony from S.N.K., her case worker, the visitation supervisor, and J.K
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051352 - 2025-12-16
[PDF]
State v. Jonathon R.
in a juvenile case under ch. 938, STATS., requires us to view the evidence from the standpoint most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12518 - 2017-09-21
in a juvenile case under ch. 938, STATS., requires us to view the evidence from the standpoint most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12518 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174370 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174370 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brook E. Grzelak
, as the State concedes, it did not file a cross-appeal in this case.[2] A cross-appeal must be filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15835 - 2005-03-31
, as the State concedes, it did not file a cross-appeal in this case.[2] A cross-appeal must be filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15835 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927357 - 2025-03-18
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=927357 - 2025-03-18
Hoeppner Building Corporation v. Wiersgalla Company
of limitations in breach of contract cases. Hoeppner did not commence its action until October 2001, more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6175 - 2005-03-31
of limitations in breach of contract cases. Hoeppner did not commence its action until October 2001, more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6175 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey H. Andrus
the case. As noted, Andrus waived that breach when counsel failed to object at sentencing. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9189 - 2017-09-19
the case. As noted, Andrus waived that breach when counsel failed to object at sentencing. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9189 - 2017-09-19