Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7811 - 7820 of 29429 for er.

[PDF] State v. Priest Johnson
conviction without proof that the assailant knew the victim was a child; (2) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2197 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Scott J. Konze
contends that the trial court erred when it allowed the State to amend the first charge from second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8964 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Paul J. May v. Pecatonica Rail Transit Commission
erred by dismissing with prejudice. We therefore modify the judgment, and affirm as modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9188 - 2017-09-19

State v. Mark V. Reid
at sentencing, and (2) whether the trial court erred in denying Reid's motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10037 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Roy E. Ridener
motion for a reduced sentence. He contends that the trial court erred by refusing to reduce a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2191 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Judith E. Smriga v. Paul S. Smriga
erred because it failed to consider Judith’s need (or, as he argues, lack thereof ) and his ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13765 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Clara C. Nelson v. City of Mauston
. Therefore, we conclude that the trial court erred in granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7894 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Mark L. Dryden
motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether the court erred by concluding that Dryden’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14757 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Dwight Manuel v. Direct Transit, Inc.
-2253 -2- court erred in not granting his post-verdict motion to change the damages award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9527 - 2017-09-19

Robert C. Beese v. Lance Weirsma
court erred in refusing his request for a substitution of judge. Because we agree with the later claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3340 - 2005-03-31