Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78161 - 78170 of 82420 for simple case.
Search results 78161 - 78170 of 82420 for simple case.
State v. Brian Blumenberg
his service weapon and a shotgun. The shotgun was removed from its case. They observed numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15519 - 2005-03-31
his service weapon and a shotgun. The shotgun was removed from its case. They observed numerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15519 - 2005-03-31
Nicholas Christman v. Michael Galanton
This is not a Bell case. In Bell, the victim was dead and unable to report on the circumstances surrounding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6105 - 2005-03-31
This is not a Bell case. In Bell, the victim was dead and unable to report on the circumstances surrounding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6105 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dale W. Repinski
concludes that Liptak was not deficient by recommending that these misdemeanor cases be consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10181 - 2005-03-31
concludes that Liptak was not deficient by recommending that these misdemeanor cases be consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10181 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965412 - 2025-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
inference might be that an inmate deposited a petition (or in this case, a trial demand) in an institution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125425 - 2014-10-29
inference might be that an inmate deposited a petition (or in this case, a trial demand) in an institution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125425 - 2014-10-29
Milwaukee County v. Edward S.
was a correct statement of the law, no ground for reversal exists. See id. In this case, therefore, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13987 - 2005-03-31
was a correct statement of the law, no ground for reversal exists. See id. In this case, therefore, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13987 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wittmann raises on appeal. Applying the holding in Plaza Services to this case, we affirm the dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036689 - 2025-11-12
Wittmann raises on appeal. Applying the holding in Plaza Services to this case, we affirm the dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036689 - 2025-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
App 70, ΒΆ18, 252 Wis. 2d 676, 643 N.W.2d 132. As the circuit court in the present case observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28467 - 2007-03-19
App 70, ΒΆ18, 252 Wis. 2d 676, 643 N.W.2d 132. As the circuit court in the present case observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28467 - 2007-03-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court addressed the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165551 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court addressed the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165551 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a conclusion on the arguable merit of any potential issue in this case. Ellis is not precluded from raising
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27
a conclusion on the arguable merit of any potential issue in this case. Ellis is not precluded from raising
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27