Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 16449 for commentating.

CA Blank Order
738 (Ct. App. 1984). The record shows that Stargardt was afforded an opportunity to comment on the PSI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137148 - 2015-03-08

[PDF] NOTICE
. This makes the situation much more serious than the mere “erratic driving” comment by the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35791 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, this is not the case to comment upon, much less adopt or refuse to adopt, the Restatement and related cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28

State v. John Karl
law. The trial court did, however, comment that “the court will at this point not grant a Huber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12573 - 2005-03-31

State v. Todd Jerovetz
that recommended a prison term. Here, all of the prosecutor’s comments support his argument for a three-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5356 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
sentencing comments and our deference to the trial court, see id. at 183, we cannot conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97439 - 2013-05-28

COURT OF APPEALS
in the context of all of the court’s comments, the phrase that “Mr. Kuchembecker has got two things against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32843 - 2008-05-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
738 (Ct. App. 1984). The record shows that Paul was afforded an opportunity to comment on the PSI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146250 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dennis C. Marth
to review and comment upon the predictive tests given to Marth by No. 02-0795 4 the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5075 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
that the audiologist’s comment described his situation or present evidence as to what information he did not hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93745 - 2013-03-12