Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 29975 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 29975 for consulta de causas.
State v. Daniel T.
of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. In re Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6444 - 2005-03-31
of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. In re Kendell G., 2001 WI App 95, ¶9, 243 Wis. 2d 67, 625
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6444 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for reconsideration raised a new issue is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Edwards, 2003 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660646 - 2023-05-31
for reconsideration raised a new issue is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Edwards, 2003 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660646 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
County of Calumet v. Andrew I. Turk
of law subject to our de novo review. Id. Here, Tenor articulated two grounds for the investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21673 - 2017-09-21
of law subject to our de novo review. Id. Here, Tenor articulated two grounds for the investigatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21673 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Neil P. Gates
of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15171 - 2017-09-21
of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15171 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is subject to de novo review. ¶9 Under Wis. Stat. § 973.048(1m), a sentencing court may order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32539 - 2008-04-29
is subject to de novo review. ¶9 Under Wis. Stat. § 973.048(1m), a sentencing court may order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32539 - 2008-04-29
[PDF]
East of the River Enterprises II, L.L.C. v. City of Hudson
unconstitutional if it has merely a de minimis or incidental effect. See id. at 1393-94. ¶4 The City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16101 - 2017-09-21
unconstitutional if it has merely a de minimis or incidental effect. See id. at 1393-94. ¶4 The City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16101 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alexander Dejesus
reviews de novo. Id. WAS THERE A SEIZURE? Both the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9707 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. Id. WAS THERE A SEIZURE? Both the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9707 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Dunn v. Ronald J. Kistner
and second, we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7287 - 2017-09-20
and second, we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7287 - 2017-09-20
State v. Wylie McDonald, Jr.
. Whether a stop and frisk are constitutional presents issues subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11733 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a stop and frisk are constitutional presents issues subject to de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11733 - 2005-03-31
Lillian Dallman v. Theodore Pyke, Jr.
. Personal jurisdiction is a question of law, which we review de novo. Marsh v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10484 - 2005-03-31
. Personal jurisdiction is a question of law, which we review de novo. Marsh v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10484 - 2005-03-31