Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 30165 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 30165 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact de novo. Id. Investigative traffic stops are subject to the constitutional requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095626 - 2026-03-25
findings of fact de novo. Id. Investigative traffic stops are subject to the constitutional requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095626 - 2026-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. State v. Guard, 2012 WI App 8, ¶14, 338 Wis. 2d 385, 808 N.W.2d 718. However, we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250990 - 2019-12-11
. State v. Guard, 2012 WI App 8, ¶14, 338 Wis. 2d 385, 808 N.W.2d 718. However, we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250990 - 2019-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reject these two possible arguments and affirm. ¶2 This court interprets and applies statutes de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237848 - 2019-03-21
reject these two possible arguments and affirm. ¶2 This court interprets and applies statutes de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237848 - 2019-03-21
[PDF]
Sally R. Dix v. John Patrick Styer
of a set of facts to a statutory standard, a question of law we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11708 - 2017-09-20
of a set of facts to a statutory standard, a question of law we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11708 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is procedurally barred is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251417 - 2019-12-18
is procedurally barred is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251417 - 2019-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in jeopardy twice for the same offense is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142822 - 2017-09-21
in jeopardy twice for the same offense is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142822 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
David Kosmo v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transporation
of law we review de novo. Dziewa v. Vossler, 149 Wis.2d 74, 77, 438 N.W.2d 565, 566 (1989). A motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10734 - 2017-09-20
of law we review de novo. Dziewa v. Vossler, 149 Wis.2d 74, 77, 438 N.W.2d 565, 566 (1989). A motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10734 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Alan C. Olson & Associates v. Susannah Q. Carey
, the interpretation of which is subject to our de novo review. See Boltz v. Boltz, 133 Wis. 2d 278, 282, 395 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7249 - 2017-09-20
, the interpretation of which is subject to our de novo review. See Boltz v. Boltz, 133 Wis. 2d 278, 282, 395 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7249 - 2017-09-20
State v. Guy S. Ruppenthal
. See De Nava v. DNR, 140 Wis.2d 213, 220, 409 N.W.2d 151, 154 (Ct. App. 1987). We employ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14215 - 2005-03-31
. See De Nava v. DNR, 140 Wis.2d 213, 220, 409 N.W.2d 151, 154 (Ct. App. 1987). We employ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14215 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Patton, 2006 WI App 235, ¶7, 297 Wis. 2d 415, 724 N.W.2d 347. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51937 - 2010-07-13
. State v. Patton, 2006 WI App 235, ¶7, 297 Wis. 2d 415, 724 N.W.2d 347. This court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51937 - 2010-07-13