Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 16073 for probate.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 16073 for probate.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. No. 2007AP2964 3 representative of the estate. Because the estate was never probated, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35528 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2007AP2964 3 representative of the estate. Because the estate was never probated, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35528 - 2014-09-15
Mary Klauser v. Robert Schmitz
representative of the estate. ¶3 Mrs. Schmitz’s will was admitted to probate without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5955 - 2005-03-31
representative of the estate. ¶3 Mrs. Schmitz’s will was admitted to probate without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5955 - 2005-03-31
State v. Aaron Evans
continues: (13)(c) The court, before imposing sentence or ordering probation, shall inquire of the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15946 - 2005-03-31
continues: (13)(c) The court, before imposing sentence or ordering probation, shall inquire of the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15946 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Orzell P. Grinnage
-CRNM 2 second robbery count, sentence was withheld and he received ten years probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14260 - 2014-09-15
-CRNM 2 second robbery count, sentence was withheld and he received ten years probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14260 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Peter P. Grandaw v. David H. Schwarz
WIS. STAT. § 304.06(3). 1 However, the revocation of parole or probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3386 - 2017-09-19
WIS. STAT. § 304.06(3). 1 However, the revocation of parole or probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3386 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Philip J. Foster
two, the prosecution agreed to recommend consecutive probation. The defense was free to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14978 - 2017-09-21
two, the prosecution agreed to recommend consecutive probation. The defense was free to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14978 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dean A. Molzner
of probation was a collateral consequence to a no contest plea because the resentencing was contingent upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15090 - 2005-03-31
of probation was a collateral consequence to a no contest plea because the resentencing was contingent upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15090 - 2005-03-31
State v. Geraldine A. Molzner
of probation was a collateral consequence to a no contest plea because the resentencing was contingent upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15091 - 2005-03-31
of probation was a collateral consequence to a no contest plea because the resentencing was contingent upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15091 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph A. Kayon
provides in part: (1r) When imposing sentence or ordering probation for any crime for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4350 - 2005-03-31
provides in part: (1r) When imposing sentence or ordering probation for any crime for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4350 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The trial court was mindful that Russ already had an opportunity for probation that ha[d] not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31786 - 2008-02-11
The trial court was mindful that Russ already had an opportunity for probation that ha[d] not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31786 - 2008-02-11