Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 74636 for public records.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 74636 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136289 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136289 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92790 - 2014-09-15
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92790 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98450 - 2014-09-15
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98450 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(1967). Matthews filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Matthews
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219298 - 2018-09-19
(1967). Matthews filed a response. After reviewing the record, counsel’s report, and Matthews
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219298 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, and has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964079 - 2025-06-03
a response, and has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964079 - 2025-06-03
State v. Rodney Dombrowski
, no colloquy was required and this court may examine the totality of the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5774 - 2005-03-31
, no colloquy was required and this court may examine the totality of the record to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5774 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, and has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964079 - 2025-06-03
a response, and has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964079 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-7986 Ellen J. Krahn Assistant State Public Defender P. O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117698 - 2017-09-21
-7986 Ellen J. Krahn Assistant State Public Defender P. O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117698 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas J. Becker
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10493 - 2005-03-31
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10493 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91814 - 2013-01-22
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91814 - 2013-01-22