Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 21492 for warrants.
Search results 7821 - 7830 of 21492 for warrants.
Susan Bauer v. Village of DeForest
known, warrants a frivolousness determination, is a question of law we review de novo. Stern v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31
known, warrants a frivolousness determination, is a question of law we review de novo. Stern v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kirk Ennenga
that would warrant disqualification under § 757.19(2)(g), STATS. In neither case, however, does the mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15011 - 2017-09-21
that would warrant disqualification under § 757.19(2)(g), STATS. In neither case, however, does the mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15011 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Hilbert Randy S.
to warrant discharge. Because of the therapy received, evidence of recent action exhibiting "dangerousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3140 - 2017-09-19
to warrant discharge. Because of the therapy received, evidence of recent action exhibiting "dangerousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3140 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anderson
means facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge that are sufficient to warrant a prudent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10059 - 2017-09-19
means facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge that are sufficient to warrant a prudent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10059 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is the rule and not the exception and that restitution should be ordered whenever warranted.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102338 - 2017-09-21
is the rule and not the exception and that restitution should be ordered whenever warranted.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102338 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
facts to warrant an evidentiary hearing. ¶6 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119836 - 2014-08-20
facts to warrant an evidentiary hearing. ¶6 A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119836 - 2014-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
presented to us so warranted. See McMillian, 132 Wis. 2d at 279-80. Singh failed, however, to provide
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134426 - 2017-09-21
presented to us so warranted. See McMillian, 132 Wis. 2d at 279-80. Singh failed, however, to provide
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134426 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
are biased and should be removed from the record. This argument is insufficiently developed to warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36842 - 2009-06-17
are biased and should be removed from the record. This argument is insufficiently developed to warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36842 - 2009-06-17
[PDF]
State v. James Ware
of responsibility for the crime were “new factors” upon which modification of sentence was warranted; (2) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11274 - 2017-09-19
of responsibility for the crime were “new factors” upon which modification of sentence was warranted; (2) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11274 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the case to the court to determine whether summary reversal was warranted. On August 28, 2025, I entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024199 - 2025-10-16
the case to the court to determine whether summary reversal was warranted. On August 28, 2025, I entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024199 - 2025-10-16

