Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 78281 - 78290 of 83765 for simple case search.
Search results 78281 - 78290 of 83765 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.” State v. McCallum, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2011-05-02
is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.” State v. McCallum, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63280 - 2011-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916623 - 2025-02-20
review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916623 - 2025-02-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
Claire County case. During the plea hearing, the State informed the court that restitution would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34536 - 2014-09-15
Claire County case. During the plea hearing, the State informed the court that restitution would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34536 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
doing any outside investigation of Grandison’s record or doing any research in the case. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132444 - 2017-09-21
doing any outside investigation of Grandison’s record or doing any research in the case. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132444 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212293 - 2018-05-09
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212293 - 2018-05-09
[PDF]
State v. Richard Stensvad
the dangerousness standard confirmed by the Randall court. We disagree. The trial court in this case undertook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7699 - 2017-09-19
the dangerousness standard confirmed by the Randall court. We disagree. The trial court in this case undertook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7699 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
resolved Maddox’s case on procedural grounds, we do not reach the merits of his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
resolved Maddox’s case on procedural grounds, we do not reach the merits of his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
K. Angela O'Donnell v. Thomas Murray
742 (1935), and Monsivais, 179 Wis. 2d at 764, is misplaced, as in each of these cases the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15666 - 2005-03-31
742 (1935), and Monsivais, 179 Wis. 2d at 764, is misplaced, as in each of these cases the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15666 - 2005-03-31
December Table of Unpublished Opinions
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20907 - 2006-01-09
judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket No. Title
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20907 - 2006-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
would not foresee this response to the statement made by the officer in this case. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33209 - 2008-06-24
would not foresee this response to the statement made by the officer in this case. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33209 - 2008-06-24