Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7831 - 7840 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 7831 - 7840 of 83278 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
the jury in proper consideration of the case; (2) whether a party will be unduly prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31137 - 2007-12-10
the jury in proper consideration of the case; (2) whether a party will be unduly prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31137 - 2007-12-10
[MS WORD]
JD-1745: Dispositional Order (Delinquent)
OF Name Date of Birth |_| Amended Dispositional Order – Delinquent Case
/formdisplay/JD-1745.doc?formNumber=JD-1745&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2026-02-17
OF Name Date of Birth |_| Amended Dispositional Order – Delinquent Case
/formdisplay/JD-1745.doc?formNumber=JD-1745&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2026-02-17
State v. Mary F.-R.
the rebuttal testimony of a social worker. Pursuant to this court's order dated November 1, 1995, this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
the rebuttal testimony of a social worker. Pursuant to this court's order dated November 1, 1995, this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as an unreasonable search and seizure. He argued first that the deputy lacked reasonable suspicion for the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91896 - 2014-09-15
as an unreasonable search and seizure. He argued first that the deputy lacked reasonable suspicion for the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91896 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mary F.-R.
the rebuttal testimony of a social worker. Pursuant to this court's order dated November 1, 1995, this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9700 - 2017-09-19
the rebuttal testimony of a social worker. Pursuant to this court's order dated November 1, 1995, this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9700 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142793 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142793 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936976 - 2025-04-08
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936976 - 2025-04-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
factors: (1) whether the statement will aid the jury in proper consideration of the case; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31137 - 2014-09-15
factors: (1) whether the statement will aid the jury in proper consideration of the case; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31137 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
consent from Bentz, Otte searched the vehicle and found no alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209945 - 2018-03-21
consent from Bentz, Otte searched the vehicle and found no alcohol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209945 - 2018-03-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
turned the search light of his squad car on the stopped car and saw one person, later identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501805 - 2022-03-31
turned the search light of his squad car on the stopped car and saw one person, later identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501805 - 2022-03-31