Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7831 - 7840 of 69013 for did.
Search results 7831 - 7840 of 69013 for did.
State v. William J. Volovsek
that his attorney did not present an available defense on his behalf, misinformed him about the amount he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12737 - 2005-03-31
that his attorney did not present an available defense on his behalf, misinformed him about the amount he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12737 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
listed the Marathon County convictions and sentences, and it noted that Beyersdorf did not dispute any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542903 - 2022-07-13
listed the Marathon County convictions and sentences, and it noted that Beyersdorf did not dispute any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542903 - 2022-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
actions. The State argued that the patron’s actions did not implicate Raue’s Fourth Amendment rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67329 - 2014-09-15
actions. The State argued that the patron’s actions did not implicate Raue’s Fourth Amendment rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67329 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was irrelevant because it did not make it more or less probable that he had sexual intercourse with Kori. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133873 - 2015-02-03
was irrelevant because it did not make it more or less probable that he had sexual intercourse with Kori. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133873 - 2015-02-03
Town of Eldorado v. Harry Schmitz, Jr.
argues on appeal that the Town did not have a rational basis for imposing the $100 fee. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5105 - 2005-03-31
argues on appeal that the Town did not have a rational basis for imposing the $100 fee. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5105 - 2005-03-31
State v. Casey J. Shelton
that the officer did have probable cause and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Deputy Gregory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3930 - 2005-03-31
that the officer did have probable cause and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Deputy Gregory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3930 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rehabilitative control. Id., ¶43 n.11. ¶4 Brodie first contends that the circuit court did not adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202700 - 2017-11-21
rehabilitative control. Id., ¶43 n.11. ¶4 Brodie first contends that the circuit court did not adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202700 - 2017-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to sentence him the way it did, he would not have entered into a plea deal. Counsel addresses this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859920 - 2024-10-09
to sentence him the way it did, he would not have entered into a plea deal. Counsel addresses this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859920 - 2024-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
ineligibility did not support a sentence reduction. We affirm the order. ¶2 In August 1997, upon his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33548 - 2014-09-15
ineligibility did not support a sentence reduction. We affirm the order. ¶2 In August 1997, upon his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33548 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Chang N. Ju
discretion. Ju did not, however, pursue the issue of severance before the trial court. This omission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13262 - 2017-09-21
discretion. Ju did not, however, pursue the issue of severance before the trial court. This omission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13262 - 2017-09-21